Complex Analysis Integral by Substitution

Click For Summary
The integral under discussion involves a substitution that transforms the path of integration from a straight line to a closed contour around the origin. This change results in the endpoints of the integral being the same, leading to confusion about obtaining a zero value. However, the integral is equivalent to the contour integral of 1/u, which evaluates to 2πi, indicating that the integral is not zero despite the endpoints being identical. The multivalued nature of the logarithmic function complicates the evaluation, as the path taken during integration must be considered. Ultimately, the integral reflects the presence of a singularity within the contour, which is crucial for understanding the result.
Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
Im trying to take the integral, using substitution, of \int_0^1\frac{2\pi i[cos(2\pi t) + isin(2\pi t)]dt}{cos(2\pi t)+isin(2\pi t)}

So I set u=cos(2\pi t)+isin(2\pi t)du=2\pi i[cos(2\pi t) + isin(2\pi t)]dt

Yet when I change the endpoints of the integral I get from 1 to 1, which doesn't make sense. Since the fraction is equal to 2πi I could just take the integral directly and get 2πi, yet for some reason doing it by substitution gives me 0. This integral was a pull back from the integral of 1/z around a closed curve, so it seems that for some reason by doing the u-du substitution the integral "forgets" that there is a singularity on the interior of the curve, what is going on here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Poopsilon said:
Im trying to take the integral, using substitution, of \int_0^1\frac{2\pi i[cos(2\pi t) + isin(2\pi t)]dt}{cos(2\pi t)+isin(2\pi t)}

So I set u=cos(2\pi t)+isin(2\pi t)du=2\pi i[cos(2\pi t) + isin(2\pi t)]dt

Yet when I change the endpoints of the integral I get from 1 to 1, which doesn't make sense. Since the fraction is equal to 2πi I could just take the integral directly and get 2πi, yet for some reason doing it by substitution gives me 0. This integral was a pull back from the integral of 1/z around a closed curve, so it seems that for some reason by doing the u-du substitution the integral "forgets" that there is a singularity on the interior of the curve, what is going on here?

Setting u=\cos(2\pi t)+i\sin(2\pi t) for 0\leq t\leq 1 changes the path of integration from a straight line over the real axis to a closed contour about the origin with radius one. So your integral is equivalent to:

\mathop\oint\limits_{|u|=1} \frac{du}{u}=2\pi i
 
And the endpoints of the integration of du/u are 1 and 1. But that doesn't mean the integral is zero. The antiderivative of 1/u is log(u) and that's multivalued. You can't just insert the limits without considering the path.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K