Complex Analysis or Differential Geometry first

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the dilemma of selecting a math course for the upcoming term, with the individual already enrolled in two physics courses and required to take an English class. The options are differential geometry, which is offered infrequently and is in-depth, and complex analysis, which is seen as a logical progression from real analysis. There is a strong recommendation to prioritize differential geometry due to its rarity and relevance to understanding concepts in general relativity. While complex analysis is acknowledged for its importance in mathematics, it is suggested that differential geometry may provide more immediate benefits in the context of physics. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards taking the differential geometry course while recognizing the value of both subjects.
Credulous
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I have to choose which math course I'm going to take next term. I want to take both but I'm already taking two physics courses and my college's distribution requirements require that I take an English next term... bleh... I could audit one of the physics and then take both math courses, but that would be extremely difficult (I tried it this year and had to drop the audit after 5 weeks of drowning).

Anyways, the differential geometry course is a tutorial, meaning it's going to be extremely in depth, and this course is only offered once every two years. I really want to take it, but I feel like complex analysis makes more sense to take as a sequel to real analyis. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter, both can be taken right now. So choose what you like best.
If differential geometry isn't offered a lot, then you should take the opportunity and take the course.
 
Ideally, you will study both at some point. If you have to choose one, I recommend differential geometry. This will help you understand general relativity better. Complex analysis on the other hand will help you understand things like integrals and the fundamental theorem of algebra, things that aren't quite as closely related to physics.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K