Complex Analysis: Show Integration of f(z)f' dz is Purely Imaginary

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a complex analysis problem involving the integration of the product of an analytic function and its derivative over a closed curve. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that this integral is purely imaginary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the integral of f(z)f'(z) and the properties of analytic functions, with one participant suggesting the use of Cauchy's formula. Another participant corrects the statement to focus on the integral of the conjugate of f multiplied by f'. Various attempts to manipulate the integral expressions are presented, including considerations of real and imaginary components.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and alternative approaches. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several lines of reasoning are being explored, including the use of the winding number and the manipulation of integral expressions to isolate real and imaginary parts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of poles and residues in the context of the integral, as well as the potential implications of the winding number in their attempts to prove the statement.

sbashrawi
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let gama be a closed curve and f be analytic function. Show that the integration of f(z)f' dz is puerly imaginary

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome sbashrawi,
As f(z)f'(z) = (1/2) d/dz f^2 , Cauchy's formula shows that what you claim is invalid unless gamma encircles some poles of f with real residues at them.
 
Thank you very much

I am sorry the true statement is that :

integration of ( conjugate of f ) * f' *dz is purely imaginary.

I tried to prove it using the winding number but I couldn't
 
Take the real part of the integral expression by adding the complex conjugate.
 
Hi

here is what I did:

integ(conj(f)*f'dz) = integr( f + conj(f))*f'dz
which implies

integ [ conj(f) - 2 Re(f)] * f' dz = 0

letting f = u + iv , then the expression will be
integ[ -u -iv] * f' dz = 0

then I couldn't find how it is purely imaginary from this step
 
integr( f + conj(f))*f'dz =

integr (2Re(f))*f'dz =

integr[(2 u) (du + i dv)] =

2i integr u dv
 
Thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K