Complex analysis showing solutions are inside or outside R

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a complex analysis problem involving the equation z + (R²/z) = 2w, where w is not in the interval [-R, R]. Participants are tasked with showing that there is one solution z with |z| < R and another with |z| > R.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the roots of the quadratic equation formed from the original equation and their magnitudes relative to R. There is exploration of the implications of the product of the roots being R² and the conditions under which the roots lie inside or outside the circle |z| = R.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the nature of the roots and their relationship to the variable w. There is ongoing exploration of the conditions under which w must fall within the interval [-R, R], with various interpretations being discussed. The conversation reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty, particularly regarding the implications of the roots being equal in magnitude.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint that w is not in the interval [-R, R], which is central to the problem's requirements. There is also a focus on the implications of the roots being complex conjugates and the conditions that lead to this conclusion.

d2j2003
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose w is not in the interval [-R,R] show that the equation z+[itex]\frac{R^{2}}{z}[/itex]=2w has one solution z with |z|<R and one solution z with |z|>R

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



the book mentions that the quadratic is left unchanged by the substitution of [itex]\frac{R^{2}}{z}[/itex] for z which I understand.

It then goes on to say that because of this, the two roots z[itex]_{1}[/itex] and z[itex]_{2}[/itex]are related by z[itex]_{1}[/itex]z[itex]_{2}[/itex]=R[itex]^{2}[/itex] which is where I get lost..

any help is appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write your equation as z^2-2wz+R^2=0. If there are two roots z1 and z2 then it factors into (z-z1)(z-z2)=0. Multiply that back out and equate it to the original equation.
 
ahh ok.. can't believe I missed that. now the book says that because z1z2=R^2 the roots lie on opposite sides of the circle |z|=R. Why is this? I'm assuming they mean inside the circle and outside the circle when they say opposite sides.. And my guess would be that z1z2 = R^2 when z1=z2=R or if z1 is larger than R and z2 is smaller than R or vice versa. The latter meaning that z1 is inside the circle and z2 is outside. The first would mean that the roots lie on the circle|z|=R?
 
d2j2003 said:
ahh ok.. can't believe I missed that. now the book says that because z1z2=R^2 the roots lie on opposite sides of the circle |z|=R. Why is this? I'm assuming they mean inside the circle and outside the circle when they say opposite sides.. And my guess would be that z1z2 = R^2 when z1=z2=R or if z1 is larger than R and z2 is smaller than R or vice versa. The latter meaning that z1 is inside the circle and z2 is outside. The first would mean that the roots lie on the circle|z|=R?

|z1|*|z2|=R^2. So if |z1|<R, |z2|>R. That's the easy case. You are done. Now suppose |z1|=|z2|=R. To eliminate that possibility you'd better say something about w.
 
so for |z1|=|z2|=R, w would have to be in [-R,R] but this possibility was eliminated in the statement of the problem. So then the only possibility is for |z1|<R and |z2|>R or vice versa.
 
d2j2003 said:
so for |z1|=|z2|=R, w would have to be in [-R,R] but this possibility was eliminated in the statement of the problem. So then the only possibility is for |z1|<R and |z2|>R or vice versa.

How did you show w would need to be in [-R,R]?
 
because for |z1|=|z2|=R would mean that (z-w)[itex]^{2}[/itex]=z[itex]^{2}[/itex]-2zw+w[itex]^{2}[/itex]=z[itex]^{2}[/itex]-2zw+R[itex]^{2}[/itex] so w[itex]^{2}[/itex]=R[itex]^{2}[/itex] and w=R which is in [-R,R]
 
d2j2003 said:
because for |z1|=|z2|=R would mean that (z-w)[itex]^{2}[/itex]=z[itex]^{2}[/itex]-2zw+w[itex]^{2}[/itex]=z[itex]^{2}[/itex]-2zw+R[itex]^{2}[/itex] so w[itex]^{2}[/itex]=R[itex]^{2}[/itex] and w=R which is in [-R,R]

Why should (z-w)^2=z^2-2zw+R^2? Your conclusion that w^2=R^2 is false. If you think harder about it you should be able to figure out the w is related to the sum of the roots z1 and z2, just like R^2 is related to the product of the roots.
 
z1z2 must = R^2 and -z1-z2 must = -2w so z1+z2=2w now since |z1|=|z2|=R we have that R+R=2R=2w meaning R=w and R is in [-R,R]
 
  • #10
d2j2003 said:
z1z2 must = R^2 and -z1-z2 must = -2w so z1+z2=2w now since |z1|=|z2|=R we have that R+R=2R=2w meaning R=w and R is in [-R,R]

Yes, z1*z2=R^2 and z1+z2=2w. And yes, assume |z1|=|z2|=R. The rest of that doesn't make sense. w doesn't have to equal R.
 
  • #11
I thought if |z1|=|z2|=R then 2w=|z1|+|z2|=R+R=2R
 
  • #12
d2j2003 said:
I thought if |z1|=|z2|=R then 2w=|z1|+|z2|=R+R=2R

That doesn't work. Pick z1=iR and z2=(-iR). That makes w=0.
 
  • #13
ok.. so I know that z1*z2=R^2 and z1+z2=2w. And |z1|=|z2|=R I am just unsure of how to conclude that w is in [-R,R]...

thanks for your patience with this, its just not clicking.
 
  • #14
d2j2003 said:
ok.. so I know that z1*z2=R^2 and z1+z2=2w. And |z1|=|z2|=R I am just unsure of how to conclude that w is in [-R,R]...

thanks for your patience with this, its just not clicking.

Can you convince me that z1 and z2 are complex conjugates of each other?
 
  • #15
could we say that since z1*z2=R^2 and R is a real number, that z1 and z2 have to be of the form (a+ib)(c-id) to eliminate the imaginary parts and since we are saying that |z1|=|z2|=R we know that a=c and b=d in the equation so z1 and z2 must be complex conjugates.
 
  • #16
d2j2003 said:
could we say that since z1*z2=R^2 and R is a real number, that z1 and z2 have to be of the form (a+ib)(c-id) to eliminate the imaginary parts and since we are saying that |z1|=|z2|=R we know that a=c and b=d in the equation so z1 and z2 must be complex conjugates.

That's not at all convincing. What must z1 and z2 look like in polar form?
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K