Complex Analysis: Sin z, Branch Cuts & e^z

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around complex analysis, specifically focusing on the properties of the sine function for complex arguments, the concept of branch cuts, and the behavior of the exponential function in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the boundedness of sin(z) for complex z and discuss its expression in terms of real functions. They question the nature of branch cuts and their role in defining single-valued functions from multivalued ones. The relationship between the exponential function and branch cuts is also examined.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of sin(z) and the necessity of branch cuts for functions like log(z). There is an ongoing exploration of how different branches arise and the implications of choosing specific values for arguments in complex functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with definitions and properties of functions in complex analysis, particularly regarding multivalued functions and the implications of branch cuts. There is mention of specific intervals for arguments and the behavior of functions around the negative real axis.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
(i) can someone explain why sin z isn't bounded if z is complex

(ii) also can someone explain how branch cuts work and what their use is? I've been sitting in tutorials wondering what's going on for the last few weeks!

(iii) does [itex]e^z[/itex] have a branch cut?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, work out what sin(x+iy) is in terms of real functions of x and y. Branch cuts are ways of restricting the selecting part of the complex plane so that a 'function' that would be multiple valued (like sqrt(z), if z^2=y then also (-z)^2=y) can be restricted to a single value (a branch). Is e^z one of those cases where there are multiple values of y such that y=e^z?
 
ok:
(i) [itex]\sin(x+iy)=i[\sin{x} \cosh{y} + \cos{x} \sinh{y}][/itex] which diverges due to the hyperbolic trig functions and hence can't be bounded-is that ok?

(ii)so if we have some f(z) that is multivalued i.e. there is more than one z that produces the same value of f(z) then is it true that these different values of z are the different "branches"?
and so we restrict the copmlex plane in such a way so that we only have one value of z that corresponds to that f(z)-this is essentially cutting out the branches we don't want -are these true - leaving us with the "principal" branch?

(iii)in my notes, when it starts talking about this it first discusses how we get a discontinuity in arg(z) on the negative real axis - what is the connection between this and the branches?

(iv)for [itex]z=|z|e^{i \theta}[/itex], when we choose the principal argument is that essentialy a branch cut?

(v)for the example you give,
[itex]f(z)=|z|^{\frac{1}{2}}e^{i \frac{\theta}{2}}[/itex] and so for [itex]\theta \rightarrow \theta + 4k \pi , k \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex], we get different branches - we make a branch cut by restricting the argument to a value in the interval [itex]\left[-\pi,\pi \right][/itex] - is that true?

(vi)[itex]e^z=e^{x+iy}=e^x(\cos{y}=i \sin{y})[/itex] - is it true that [itex]y \rightarrow y + 2 \pi[/itex] would give the same value and so this is a multivalued function and therefore has multiple branches?
 
i) your expansion sin(z) is a bit off. cos(iy)=cosh(y), not i*cosh(y), but your conclusion is correct. And yes, a branch cut let's you define a single valued function from a multiple values 'function', by selecting a uniform choice of one of the values. For the rest of your questions, you seem to be confusing exp and log. It's true that exp(z)=exp(z+2*pi*i). But that doesn't mean exp(z) is multivalued, it means that its inverse, log, is multivalued. log needs a branch cut to be well defined, not exp(z).
 
why does it need a branch cut to be well defined?

also can u explain point (iii) in post 3?
 
Because I could define log(1) to be either 0 or 2*pi*i among other choices. Defining log(|z|*exp(i*arg(z))=log(|z|)+i*arg(z). The first case corresponds to picking arg(1)=0 and the second to arg(1)=2*pi. They are both equally valid choices. If I extend the arg continuously in the first case, when I approach the negative real axis by circling ABOVE the origin I wind up near arg(z)=pi. When I circle BELOW I wind up near arg(z)=-pi. They don't match. So I cut out the negative real axis from the domain and don't worry about it. Starting with 2*pi gives me another branch of the log.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K