Complex analysis - the logarithmic function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the function Log(-z) + i(pi) is a branch of log(z) within the domain D*, which excludes points on the nonnegative real axis. The user recalls that log(z) is analytic except for a branch cut on the negative real axis, implying Log(-z) is analytic except on the positive real axis. To prove the relationship, they derive that exp(Log(-z) + i(pi)) equals z, confirming that Log(-z) + i(pi) satisfies the conditions for being a branch of log(z). The key conclusion is that since g(z) fulfills exp(g(z)) = z, it qualifies as a branch of log(z). This clarification resolves the user's initial confusion about the relationship between the functions.
mariab89
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the function Log(-z) + i(pi) is a branch of logz analytic in the domain D* consisting of all points in the plane except those on the nonnegative real axis.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that log z: = Log |z| + iArgz + i2k(pi)
I'm not sure where to start with this question, any help would be greatly appreciated!
thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know Log(z) is analytic except for a branch cut on the negative real axis. That means Log(-z) is analytic except for a branch cut on the positive real axis. So is Log(-z)+i*pi. Now you just have to show that it is a branch of log(z) by showing exp(Log(-z)+i*pi)=z.
 
so to show that what i did was...

exp(Log(-z) + i*pi) = exp(Log(-z))exp(i*pi) = (-z) (-1) = z

but.. I am still unclear how this shows that Log(-z) + i*pi is a branch of log z.
 
If g(z) satisfies exp(g(z))=z then it's a branch of log(z). That's what defines log(z). It's an inverse function of exp(z).
 
oh ok i see now!
Thanks a lot!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K