Complex collision with masses and Velcro

  • Thread starter Thread starter ago01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the analysis of elastic and inelastic collisions involving three objects, specifically focusing on the effects of Velcro in the second collision. The first collision between Object 1 and Object 2 is elastic, resulting in Object 2's final velocity of 1 m/s. However, the introduction of Velcro in the second collision between Object 2 and Object 3 transforms it into a fully inelastic collision, leading to a loss of kinetic energy and confusion in calculations. The key takeaway is that Velcro alters the nature of the collision, making it inelastic and resulting in the conservation of momentum but not kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Concept of frame dependence in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inelastic collisions and their implications on kinetic energy conservation
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in multi-object collision scenarios
  • Explore the effects of different materials (like Velcro) on collision outcomes
  • Investigate frame dependence in physics, particularly in collision analysis
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions, particularly those involving elastic and inelastic interactions.

ago01
Messages
46
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Three masses, each 1 kg, are on a frictionless track with an immovable wall to the right. The left-most mass approaches the other two at 1 m/s. The masses will experience elastic collisions with each other and the wall, except velcro will cause the two on the right to stick together (see drawing). At what speed will the left-most mass ultimately move to the left in m/s?
Relevant Equations
mv, 1/2mv^2
Drawing:

1637138723020.png


I decided to attempt to approach this as several collisions. So we can start with this:

Object 1-Object 2

This collision is elastic, so we know that ##P_i = P_f##. We also know ##K_i = K_f##.

So,

$$mv_{1i} = mv_{1f} + mv{2_f}$$
$$1 = v_{1f} + v_{2f}$$
$$v_{2f} = 1 - v_{1f}$$

and

$$1 = v_{1f}^2 + v_{2f}^2$$

Substituting these together we get:

$$1 = v_{1f}^2 + (1 - v_{1f})^2$$

and solving this quadratic equation we get that ##v_{1f} = 0## or ##v_{1f} = 1## and we can discard the 1 m/s result because we know that object 1 will transfer all of it's kinetic energy to object 2.

So, then it must be that ##v_{2f} = 1##.

Object 2 - Object 3

Now here is where I get a non-nonsensical result and I'm unsure how to proceed as continuing with this produced a final collision result equation that was absurd.

This collision again is elastic, but with the added fun of velcro. We proceed much the same way.

$$mv_{2i} = 2mv_f$$

and we immediately see the final velocity:

$$\frac{1}{2}v_{2i} = v_f$$

and substituting the previous result:

$$v_f = \frac{1}{2}$$

But when plugged into the kinetic energy equation things stop making sense (I did this to check my logic):

$$\frac{1}{2}mv_{2i}^2 = \frac{2m}{2}v_f^2$$
$$v_f = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}v_{2i}^2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}v_{2i}$$

So I got two different results. Supposing this collision is elastic these should be conserved...so I am lost.

Object 2-3 Object 1

I was unable to proceed because I got two different results above. But I will walk through my reasoning for this part so you know that I tried it (I ended up trying to solve it and got no where that made sense and unfortunately erased my work).

Since the collision is once again elastic, we know that the combined mass will collide with the wall and bounce. So under conservation of momentum this will now have a velocity equal to ##-v_f## from the previous equation. Supposing this collides with the (now) stationary first object then this should be transferred entirely to the final mass.

If I can get the second part, and the third part's logic makes sense I think I can solve this. But I could use some pointers at where I have gone wrong so far.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ago01 said:
This collision again is elastic
No. The collision is not elastic due to the velcro. In fact, the objects sticking together is characteristic of a fully inelastic collision.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ago01 and PeroK
I didn't read all of your post, but the velcro makes that particular collision totally inelastic. You can's assume that collison is elastic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ago01
Orodruin said:
No. The collision is not elastic due to the velcro. In fact, the objects sticking together is characteristic of a fully inelastic collision.
PeroK said:
I didn't read all of your post, but the velcro makes that particular collision totally inelastic. You can's assume that collison is elastic.

That would indeed explain why KE wasn't conserved since ##\frac{1}{2} \ne \frac{1}{4}##. So the collision loses about half it's KE.

I got the problem after this realization :).
 
ago01 said:
That would indeed explain why KE wasn't conserved since ##\frac{1}{2} \ne \frac{1}{4}##. So the collision loses about half it's KE.
Beware of trying to generalize this. It is a frame dependent statement. For example, in the com frame of the colliding blocks, all kinetic energy is lost.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
923
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K