Complex Conjugate of Fourier Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complex conjugate of the wavefunction in the context of Fourier transforms. Specifically, it establishes that if the wavefunction Psi(x) is expressed as a Fourier transform, its complex conjugate Psi*(x) can similarly be represented, with the form involving negative imaginary components. The multiplication of Psi(x) and Psi*(x) yields a real-valued probability density, which is confirmed through the symmetry of the Fourier transform, demonstrating that the resulting expression is indeed real due to the pairing of terms with e^{ikx} and e^{-ikx}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and their properties
  • Knowledge of complex conjugates and their mathematical implications
  • Basic grasp of probability density in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of complex conjugates in wavefunctions
  • Explore the implications of probability density in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the symmetry properties of Fourier transforms
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wavefunctions and Fourier analysis.

Epoch12000BC
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

As I understand it, the wavefunction Psi(x) can be written as a sum of all the particle's momentum basis states (which is the Fourier transform of Psi(x)). I was woundering if the wavefunction's complex conjugate Psi*(x) can be written out in terms of momentum basis states, similar to the transform of Psi(x), and if so, what form would it take in order to make make the probability density of Psi(x)Psi*(x) the correct real-valued number.

In other words, if both Psi(x) and Psi*(x) were written out in their Fourier transform forms, and multiplied together in these forms, what would the transform of Psi*(x) look like?

Any insight into this would be greatly appriciated.

-Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No magic here. If
\psi(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\!dk\, \psi(k) e^{\frac{i k x}{\hbar},
then
\psi^*(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\!dk\, \psi^*(k) e^{\frac{-i k x}{\hbar},
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help, lbrits!

I figured the complex conjugate would involve making negative all the imaginary parts of the transform, but it seemed like doing the ol' FOIL method when multiplying Psi(x) and Psi*(x) would result in a number that would generally be complex, not the real number that the probability density should be. I guess I'm a bit rusty on my math :-)

Thanks again for the help,
-droo
 
Yeah I was a bit rusty on the whole distributivity property of products over sums. Anyway, things are quite forgiving:
\psi^*(x) \psi(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi \hbar} \int\!dk\,dq\, \psi^*(k) \psi(q) e^{i (k-q)x/hbar}
I believe you can show this to be the Fourier transform of f(k) = \int\!dq\, \psi^*(k) \psi(k-q), and to show that the thing is real, is to remember that in the Fourier transform things always come in pairs, one multiplied by e^{ikx} and one by e^{-ikx}. The previous expression exhibits a symmetry under k -> -k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K