Complex Derivatives from frist principles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of a derivative for a complex function from first principles, specifically for the function z*sin(z)*cos(z). The context involves complex analysis and the application of Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the complexity of proving differentiability from first principles and the use of Cauchy-Riemann equations. There is mention of working with the function's components and the challenges faced in applying first principles.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using Cauchy-Riemann equations and suggested alternative approaches, such as applying the quotient and product rules. There is acknowledgment of the difficulty of the task, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes the successful proof of Cauchy-Riemann for the denominator and raises a question about the nature of singularities in a related function, indicating a focus on the behavior of complex functions near specific points.

NJunJie
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How to prove there's a derivative from first principles?

1/ [ z*sin(z)*cos(z) ]

z = complex = x + jy

It gets very completed.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, it gets very complicated. Sure you CAN prove it. Work out u(x,y) and v(x,y) and show they satisfy Cauchy-Riemann. That's equivalent to complex differentiability. But that's just silly. It's a colossal amount of work. z, cos(z) and sin(z) are differentiable. Show they are differentiable from first principles. Then just use the quotient rule and the product rule. Haven't we talked about this in another thread??
 
hi ya, thanks.
I've been trying and it just gets too complicated... :P
I've already proofed Cauchy Riemann for the denominator successfully - 2 pages long though.

Now i take the term alone and apply first prinicpes - just too COMPLEX. (well, i'll just state theorem as you mentioned - 'give up' heex).

Anyway, you've been a great help. :)

one more:-
sin (2z) / (z^15)

what is the location and nature of singularities here?

my answer is-
Answer: z=0 of order 15? (means 1 pole right? we always look at denominator alone?)
 
No, you don't just look at the denominator alone. E.g. z/z doesn't have a pole singularity. Expand the numerator in powers of z.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K