Complex numer express (1+i)^9/(1-i)^9

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin macks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the expression of complex numbers, specifically the division of (1+i)^9 by (1-i)^9. The user attempts to express these complex numbers in polar form as 16√9(cos(9π/4) + i sin(9π/4)) and 16√9(cos(-9π/4) - i sin(9π/4)), but encounters discrepancies in their results compared to the provided answer. The confusion stems from a misunderstanding of the division process and the notation "16surd9," which requires clarification and proper derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their polar representation
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Ability to perform operations on complex numbers, including division
NEXT STEPS
  • Review De Moivre's Theorem and its application in complex number calculations
  • Learn how to convert complex numbers from rectangular to polar form
  • Practice dividing complex numbers in polar form
  • Explore the properties of trigonometric functions in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex analysis, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of operations involving complex numbers.

kelvin macks
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i express (1+i)^9 as 16surd9(cos (9pi/4) +i sin (9pi/4)) and (1-i)^9 as 16surd9(cos (-9pi/4) -i sin (9pi/4)) , then i divide both, but my ans is (1+i)/(1-i) , which is different with the ans given, why can't i do in this way? i have attached the sample ans

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140603_093007[1].jpg
    IMG_20140603_093007[1].jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 530
  • IMG_20140603_093120[1].jpg
    IMG_20140603_093120[1].jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 465
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, what do you mean by "16surd9"? Two wrongs sometimes cancel to make a right, as is the case here. But you should show how you derived that factor. There's a misunderstanding on your part.

Next, you didn't show how you "divided both". You showed the answer sheet. Show your work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K