Complex power calculations formula

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of calculating complex power using the formula S=V(eff)I(eff)*. There is confusion regarding the conjugate of I(eff), with the understanding that I(eff) equals I(rms) and is derived from I(m), which is a real number. Clarification is provided that for phasors, the conjugate is necessary to maintain the correct phase relationship between voltage and current. The conversation explains that the real power (P) and reactive power (Q) can be derived from the complex power, emphasizing the importance of the conjugate in these calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the nuances of complex power calculations in electrical engineering.
FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
I'm confused about a point concerning complex power calculations. The formula my text gives is S=V(eff)I(eff)*. I'm confused about what the conjugate is for I(eff). The way I understand it, I(eff) = I(rms) and I(rms) = I(m)/√2. Since I(m) is a real number, and I(m)/√2 is real, how is there a conjugate.
For example:
i(t)= 20cos(ωt+165)
I(m)=20
I(eff)=20/√2
...so what is I(eff)*?

I've read through the textbook book the only examples that I can find use the equation: S=(1/2)VI*.

I would be grateful for any help you could provide to help me understand this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi FrankJ777! :smile:

Complex power is supposed to be complex.

For a perfect resistor, the complex power is purely real,

and for a perfect capacitor or inductor, it's purely imaginary …

but for a mixture, it'll be "genuinely complex", but with a constant phase …

(because we assume the current leads the voltage by a constant phase, and so 1/2 VI* subtracts the two phases, and keeps the total phase constant :wink:) …

I think :redface:
 
If
V(t) = Vmax exp[jwt + phi] and
I(t) = Imax exp[jwt + phi] then
S = (1/2) V(t) I(t)* is the rms real power.
But even if you use rms values, you still have both volt-amps and watts.
 
Also...

v(t) = Vmax/ exp[jwt]
i(t) = Imax exp[j(wt + phi)]

Veff (phasor) = v(t)/√2
Ieff (phasor) = i(t)/√2

I*eff = Imax/√2 exp[-j(wt + phi)] (note minus sign)

so (product of phasors)
Veff x I*eff = Vmax/√2 exp[jwt] x Imax/√2 exp[-j(wt + phi)]

Seff = Vmax Imax/2 exp (-jphi)
(plus exp of voltage time and minus exp of current conjugate time cancel, leaving only phi part, that's why conjugate is right for this)

real power P = Real {S} = Veff Ieff cos (-phi)
reactive power Q = Imag{S} = Veff Ieff sin (-phi)
(so 'Reactive Power' is negative for inductive circuits where phi is positive)

the phasors make a vector triangle:
S^2 = P^2 + Q^2

Sorry the formatting is not better. Still, I hope this helps.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Dr.kW! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a phi: φ and an omega: ω and try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)

Action replay (of Dr.kW :wink:):-
v(t) = Vmax/ ejωt
i(t) = Imax ej(ωt + phi)

Veff (phasor) = v(t)/√2
Ieff (phasor) = i(t)/√2

I*eff = Imax/√2 e-j(wt + φ) (note minus sign)

so (product of phasors)
Veff x I*eff = Vmax/√2 ejωt x Imax/√2 e-j(ωt + φ)

Seff = Vmax Imax/2 exp-jφ
(plus exp of voltage time and minus exp of current conjugate time cancel, leaving only φ part, that's why conjugate is right for this)

real power: P = Real {S} = Veff Ieff cos (-φ)
reactive power: Q = Imag{S} = Veff Ieff sin (-φ)
(so 'Reactive Power' is negative for inductive circuits where φ is positive)

the phasors make a vector triangle:
S2 = P2 + Q2 :wink:
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K