Complex Schrodinger Equation, references?

In summary: Schrodinger equation... in C^n... rather than in R^n, as in on the complex plane with complex valued argument rather than the real case which is what we normally consider when doing quantum mechanics. Obviously i understand that a particle's probability to be located at the position (1 + i) is not exactly physically understandable. But nonetheless, I am interested in what work has been done on the schrodinger equation in the complex plane and am hoping that somebody will be able to provide some references and/or ideas about the subject.In summary, Complex Schrodinger Equation, references?
  • #1
dimachka
47
0
Complex Schrodinger Equation, references??

hopefully i can explain what i am looking for well enough for somebody to understand. I am interested in finding any references for work that has been done on solving the schrodinger equation in C^n rather than in R^n, as in on the complex plane with complex valued argument rather than the real case which is what we normally consider when doing quantum mechanics. Obviously i understand that a particle's probability to be located at the position (1 + i) is not exactly physically understandable. But nonetheless, I am interested in what work has been done on the schrodinger equation in the complex plane and am hoping that somebody will be able to provide some references and/or ideas about the subject. (Also there will be major problems with any sort of normalization, but nonetheless I'm interested. :biggrin: )

I have tried minimal searching with google scholar and my universities article search but have not been able to find any references. Thank you for any input or help, i appreciate it greatly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Schrodinger equation is

[tex]\hat{H}\left|\psi\left(t\right)\right\rangle = i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\left|\psi\left(t\right)\right\rangle.[/tex]

For easier notation, I will now take [itex]\left|\psi\left(t\right)\right\rangle[/itex] at some moment [itex]t=t_0[/itex] so that [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle=\left|\psi\left(t_0\right)\right\rangle.[/itex] You can choose then to express [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] in the [itex]|x\rangle[/itex] basis and get what we call the wavefunction. If the state space was representing a system with [itex]n[/itex] spatial degrees of freedom, then we get a function defined on [itex]\mathbb{R}^n:[/itex]

[tex]\langle x^1, x^2...x^n|\psi\rangle = \psi\left(x^1,x^2...x^n\right).[/tex]

If you want to, you can express [itex]|\psi\rangle[/itex] in any basis you want, including ones that are defined on complex numbers.

N.B. the superscripts on my position variables are representing co-ordinate numbering, not powers.

------

If you mean, on the other hand, the energy eigenvalue equation (which is often promoted to being called the time independent Schrodinger equation, which I think is silly really, because it's equivalent to the momentum eignevalue equation, or the angular momentum eigenvalue equation &c.):

[tex]\hat{H}\left|\psi\right\rangle=E\left|\psi\right\rangle,[/tex]

then you can also cast that into any basis you prefer, as long as you remember that the Hamiltonian will also have to be in that basis.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
dimachka said:
hopefully i can explain what i am looking for well enough for somebody to understand. I am interested in finding any references for work that has been done on solving the schrodinger equation in C^n rather than in R^n, as in on the complex plane with complex valued argument rather than the real case which is what we normally consider when doing quantum mechanics.

Ah, it is not so much the "Schroedinger equation" but the Hilbert space you are changing when doing so. In other words, you now have a position basis spanning the Hilbert space which is |x,y,z> with x,y, z complex instead of real, is that it ?

I can look upon this in two ways: or there is a requirement of analycity as a function of x, y and z, in which case, I don't think that there is any difference (the "real" solution being analytically continued in the complex x,y and z plane). Or, there is no such requirement, in which case the real and imaginary parts "lead their own life, and then I fail to see the difference with a 2-particle situation |x,y,z,u,v,w> relabelled:
|x + iu, y+iv,z+iw>.

(Also there will be major problems with any sort of normalization, but nonetheless I'm interested. :biggrin: )

Yes :-) An analytic function over the whole plane is constant, or unbounded...
Imagine the "real" plane wave exp(-i k x) with imaginary x...

On the other hand, this is exactly what is done for the TIME variable. There's lots of discussion about that (from Wick rotations, to statistical mechanics)
 
  • #4
vanesch said:
Ah, it is not so much the "Schroedinger equation" but the Hilbert space you are changing when doing so. In other words, you now have a position basis spanning the Hilbert space which is |x,y,z> with x,y, z complex instead of real, is that it ?

I can look upon this in two ways: or there is a requirement of analycity as a function of x, y and z, in which case, I don't think that there is any difference (the "real" solution being analytically continued in the complex x,y and z plane). Or, there is no such requirement, in which case the real and imaginary parts "lead their own life, and then I fail to see the difference with a 2-particle situation |x,y,z,u,v,w> relabelled:
|x + iu, y+iv,z+iw>.



Yes :-) An analytic function over the whole plane is constant, or unbounded...
Imagine the "real" plane wave exp(-i k x) with imaginary x...

On the other hand, this is exactly what is done for the TIME variable. There's lots of discussion about that (from Wick rotations, to statistical mechanics)

I guess i should explain some more, as i did not explain well what i meant. I am interested in finding information on solving the general equation (-Y'' + V(z)*Y = k*dY/dt) where ' indicates spatial derivative, k is a constant, V is an arbitrary holomorphic function and Y is a function of the complex variable z and time. This is identical in form to the schrodinger equation but I'm not too interested in normalization. Specifically, i don't want bounded solutions. I am not sure, but I think that the fact that V is a complex valued function mean the solutions are not just analytic continuations of real line solutions. Seperating the real and imaginary part of V, can yield two equations but I don't know what that implies since it yields two different equations.

Please feel free to tell me anything i am saying is irrelevant slash incompetent. :tongue: I'm just interested in what input i can get, thanks a bunch!
 
  • #5
dimachka said:
I guess i should explain some more, as i did not explain well what i meant. I am interested in finding information on solving the general equation (-Y'' + V(z)*Y = k*dY/dt) where ' indicates spatial derivative, k is a constant, V is an arbitrary holomorphic function and Y is a function of the complex variable z and time.

Ah, this is where you got me: V can be a complex function. Indeed, then the problem is different from the standard Schroedinger equation. Can't help much here...
 
  • #6
In Ince's Ordinary Differential Equations (Dover Books) you'll find a long chapter on linear differential equations in the complex plane. But, as vanesch points out, there are problems with V(z) -- even if you restrict V to be real on the real axis.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
  • #7
can u give some links to the free source things
 

1. What is the Schrodinger equation?

The Schrodinger equation is a mathematical equation that describes how quantum systems, such as particles or atoms, evolve over time.

2. What is the complex Schrodinger equation?

The complex Schrodinger equation is an extension of the original Schrodinger equation, which includes complex numbers to account for the wave-like behavior of quantum systems.

3. What is the significance of the complex Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics?

The complex Schrodinger equation is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics and is used to calculate the probability of finding a particle in a particular state at a given time.

4. What are some key references for the complex Schrodinger equation?

Some key references for the complex Schrodinger equation include the original paper by Erwin Schrodinger, "Quantum Mechanics and Wave Mechanics" (1926), and books such as "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths (1995) and "Quantum Mechanics" by Franz Schwabl (2007).

5. How is the complex Schrodinger equation used in practical applications?

The complex Schrodinger equation is used in various practical applications, such as in the development of quantum computing and in the study of quantum systems in chemistry and physics. It is also used in the field of quantum optics to study the behavior of light at the quantum level.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
851
  • Quantum Physics
5
Replies
143
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
822
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
552
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top