What is the acceleration of the garden roller given certain parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhDorBust
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a garden roller being pulled by a force F at an angle alpha. The setup involves analyzing forces in both the x and y directions, as well as applying the rotational equation of motion. The derived expression for acceleration, which does not include force F, raises concerns about its validity, particularly as it suggests constant acceleration regardless of F's magnitude. Participants express confusion over the absence of F in the final formula and question the logic behind the derived result, indicating a potential error in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for a correct formulation that accurately reflects the influence of the pulling force.
PhDorBust
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
A garden roller with external radius a is pulled along a rough horizontal path by force F which acts at a point on its axle and is inclined at an angle alpha with the horizontal.

Given that resultant force is at a right angle to F, what is the acceleration of the roller? Express in terms of radius a, alpha, and radius of gyration k.

My set-up (and failure):

Let H be resultant force, f_s is frictional force

Forces in x-dir:
Hsin( \alpha) = Fcos( \alpha) - f_s
Forces in y-dir:
-Hcos( \alpha) = Fsin( \alpha) - mg
Rotational equation of motion:
af_s = \frac{mk^2}{a} \ddot{x}
Assume no slipping:
\ddot{x} = a \ddot{ \theta}
Solve for x-acceleration:
\ddot{x} = \frac{a^2 F - a^2 mgsin( \alpha)}{mk^2 cos( \alpha)}
Correct answer:
\ddot{x} = \frac{ga^2 sin( \alpha) cos( \alpha)}{k^2 + a^2 sin^2 (\alpha)}

Where am I going wrong? I don't see why F isn't in the answer...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't tried to work out the answer myself yet, but you're right that the 'correct answer' looks ridiculous.
It would predict the same acceleration even when F approaches zero, which is ridiculous.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K