MHB Compositions, Inverses and Combinations of Functions

mak23
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
HELP!

given p(q(x))=2/(5+x) and q(x)=1+x . find a formula for p(x).

Someone please help. I don't know how to do this problem .Thanks in advance
(PS: would be really helpful if solution is also given)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi mak23,

Since the denominator of p(x) contains the only instance of x, let's define a new function f(q(x)) = f(1 + x) = 5 + x.
So we start with our function f(x) and replace each instance of x with 1 + x. What is our original function f(x)?

Does that help?
 
Hi greg1313,

Thanks for replying to my post. I'm really terrible in this chapter. If u could explain step by step, I would understand much better and quickly. I'm sorry if I'm troubling u.
 
No problem. :)

Here's a hint: a + 1 + x = 5 + x. What is a? What, then, is p(x)?
 
ahaaa...Now i get it..

So p(x)=2/(4+x)

Thank you so much greg1313 for the help!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top