B Compound Angle Formula: Solving Double Angle Equations

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Farnaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the application of the double angle formula for sine, particularly with the example of sin(19pi/12). Participants highlight that multiple angle combinations can yield different results, but the goal is to find combinations that lead to exact values. It is emphasized that certain angles, like sin(3pi/4) and cos(2pi/3), provide straightforward computations, while others may not. The suggestion is made to express sin(19pi/12) in a way that simplifies the calculation, such as using sin(pi + 7pi/12). Overall, the focus is on identifying effective angle combinations for accurate sine evaluations.
Farnaz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
sin(19pi/2)=?
Hi, I am confused about how to handle the double angle formula. For example, sin(19pi/12)= sin(9pi/12+10pi/12) but there can be many other options too. like sin(18pi/12+pi/12) or sin(15pi/12+4pi/12)..every time I am getting different answers. Can anyone please how find the right one? Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you give an example where you get a different answer? And what formula are you using to expand sin(A +B)?
 
Farnaz said:
Summary:: sin(19pi/2)=?

You wrote ##\sin(\frac{19\pi}2)## above, but are asking about ##\sin(\frac{19\pi}{12})## below.
Farnaz said:
Hi, I am confused about how to handle the double angle formula. For example, sin(19pi/12)= sin(9pi/12+10pi/12) but there can be many other options too. like sin(18pi/12+pi/12) or sin(15pi/12+4pi/12)..every time I am getting different answers. Can anyone please how find the right one? Thanks
The "right one" is a combination that you can do something with, assuming the answers are to be exact rather than approximate ones.
For example, ##\sin(9\pi/12 + 10\pi/12) = \sin(3\pi/4 + 5\pi/6)## is better than your other choices here because the angles are such that the sine and cosine terms all have exact answers.
 
^I don't know what you mean by exact, none of the above is approximation.

I don't understand the op either, but I would guess he/she has two equal numbers and did not recognize them as such.

For example something like
$$\sin \left( \frac{\pi}{12} \right)=\frac{\sqrt{2-\sqrt{3}}}{2}$$
$$\sin \left( \frac{\pi}{12} \right)=\frac{\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}}{4}$$
these are equal even though they look different
 
lurflurf said:
I don't know what you mean by exact, none of the above is approximation.
I assume you're quoting what I said. The context for my remark was that the sines and cosines of certain angles can be calculated exactly and simply; for example, ##\sin(3\pi/4) = \sqrt 2/2## and ##\cos(2\pi/3) = -1/2. The trig functions of many other angles don't lend themselves such straightforward computation.
 
I would start with sin(19pi/12) = sin(pi + 7pi/12) = ... which leads to nice simple expressions with a suitable way to write 7pi/12 as sum.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top