Compton Scattering: Difficulties with Part C

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around difficulties encountered in part C of a problem related to Compton scattering, specifically focusing on the calculation of photon energy before and after a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations of photon energy and wavelength changes, questioning whether relativistic effects have been fully accounted for. There are inquiries about the correctness of the calculated energy change and the potential influence of significant figures on the final answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in the calculations presented, while others suggest that issues related to significant figures or the interpretation of the problem may be affecting the results. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations regarding the expected answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the use of external resources such as textbooks and Wikipedia, and there is a reference to the possibility of needing to clarify the answer with a tutor. The discussion hints at constraints related to rounding and the specific values provided in the problem.

Chowie
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having difficulty with part C of this question:

t2xfo.png



Homework Equations



PJuDT.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equations I correctly calculated the new wavelength of the photon after the collision and using the equations for the photon energies I calculated the energy of the photon before and after the collision to get the change in energy, which I calculated to be 380 eV (I calculated it a few times at varying degrees of accuracy at around 379.6 but the website rounds it up to 380)

Am I doing anything wrong here? Is there some relativistic stuff that I haven't accounted for or is the answer given simply wrong. I'm just using wikipedia and my textbook and it seems like 380 eV should be correct.

If I get a few people here saying that I haven't done anything wrong then I'll email my tutor and get him to change the answer.

Cheers for any replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's a matter of significant figures, perhaps you should round to 1 sig. fig.
 
I submitted a few answers which all when I clicked "my answers" came out to be the same rounded to 380
 
Looks to me like you have solved this correctly, so I am thinking either a sig figs issue or possibly they want a negative number, to indicate the lower energy of the scattered photon.

If you use a more accurate wavelength change of 5.68x10-4 nm for the energy calculation, you get the 359 eV that is shown in your first figure. However, using just 1 sig fig as I suggested before the answer rounds to 400 eV.
 
Cr*p so I should have used the change in wavelength given to me rather than recalculating it? Bo**ocks, guess I just lost some marks. Thanks for the help, at least you helped one of my friends out who had a similar issue.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K