Understanding the Importance of Hessian in Computational Chemistry Simulations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the critical role of the Hessian matrix in computational chemistry simulations, particularly for identifying saddle points in chemical reactions. The Hessian, being the second derivative of energy, is essential for distinguishing between local minima, maxima, and saddle points. Convergence issues in Hessian calculations can often be addressed by decreasing the mesh size or increasing the number of iterations. Additionally, using double precision for matrix variables can mitigate computational errors arising from small differences in output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hessian matrix and its role in energy calculations
  • Familiarity with saddle point theory in chemical reactions
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for convergence in simulations
  • Experience with matrix calculations and precision in computational software
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating Hessians in computational chemistry software
  • Learn about saddle point optimization techniques in chemical simulations
  • Explore numerical stability and precision handling in matrix computations
  • Investigate software options that support double precision calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineers, computational chemists, and researchers involved in simulating chemical reactions and optimizing computational methods.

greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

First I hope it is okay to post the problem here(?). I have some general questions regarding the use of software for chemistry simulations - my questions are more fundamental than software specific.

I would like to simulate a chemical reaction - so I should be searching for the saddle point of the reactants. In order to find this it is necessary with the Hessian - which is the second derivative of the energy. But why is it necessary to include this in order to compute the saddle point?

If one has problems getting the calculation of the Hessian to converge - what possible adjustments can one make - increasing numbers of iterations?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a point has derivative zero it can be a min, max or a saddle point. The hessian is needed to determine which of those three types the point of interest is. If the hessian (second derivative) switches sign it is a saddle point. If you didn't check the hessian one might not be sure that the point is a saddle point and not a min/max.
 
The Hessian will tell you whether the energy for the calculated geometry is a local maxima or minima. It will be positive for minima and negative for maxima. The first derivative or gradient (slope) only tells you where the change in energy is zero. The gradient = 0 only tells you that the geometry is at either a local minimum or maximum.

Sometimes the saddle point can be fairly steep (sharp?). To accurately converge to the optimal geometry, your program usually needs to approach the saddle point in very small increments (decrease the mesh size). This usually means that much more calculation is required (calculation = time). Some programs will decrease the mesh size when the change in the output between iterations becomes very small.

Small differences in the output can cause other problems as well. Often these calculations are handled as matrix calculations. Diagonalizing a matrix involves dividing by a difference. As the difference becomes small, the result is a large number. Large numbers and small numbers can cause significant errors in computation if they are not handled properly. I experienced a difficulty converging on an answer that was ultimately solved by declaring the matrix variables in double precision.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
779
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K