Compute Grounding Resistance for Sphere Electrode

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on computing the grounding resistance for a sphere electrode with a specified radius (a) in a medium with conductivity (sigma). The grounding resistance is defined as the ratio of voltage (U_ab) between the electrode surface and a distant point in the ground to the current (I) flowing into the electrode. The participants clarify the use of the formula R = ρL/A, where L is the distance between points a and b, and A is the cross-sectional area. The area of the entire sphere is considered in the computation due to the average behavior of charge carriers, which is essential for accurate resistance calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of grounding resistance concepts
  • Familiarity with electrical conductivity and resistivity
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for resistance calculations
  • Basic principles of charge movement in conductive materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of grounding resistance for different electrode shapes
  • Learn about the impact of soil conductivity on grounding systems
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics and charge distribution
  • Investigate practical applications of grounding resistance in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and professionals involved in grounding system design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

parsifal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure of the proper term here, but I'd guess it is either earth, ground or grounding resistance.

The task is to compute this grounding resistance for a sphere electrode (radius a) in a ground (conductivity sigma). The definition given for grounding resistance "between the surface of the electrode and a distant point in the ground" is the ratio of voltage between these two points (let say a and b) and current to the electrode, U_ab / I.

But I don't really know how I should use the definition in this computation. All I can come up with is this:

sigma = 1/rho => rho = 1/sigma

\Large R=\frac{\rho L}{A},L=dr,A=2 \pi r^2

\Large dR = \frac {\rho dr} {2 \pi r^2}

\Large R=\int_a^b dR

But this gives the resistance of the whole sphere of ground, right?

So should I just compute using the first equation, where L=distance between a and b, A=pi*a^2 (cross section of an imaginary tube just big enough to swallow the electrode)? Doesn't make sense either.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are on the right track, but the area of a sphere is A=4 \pi r^2. I would take the upper limit of integration to infinity. That is as distant as you can get.
 
Oh, of course. Many thanks.

However, I fail to understand the solution. Why is the area of the whole sphere around the electrode taken into the computation? I mean: if an electron tries to get from point a on the surface of the electrode to point b somewhere in the ground, what does this have to do with the part of the sphere that's on the opposite side of the electrode than b?

Like this:

(-b) ------------- (-a) --- (a) ------------- (b)

Q tries to get from (a) to (b), but in the integral the whole area is taken into account, also the area in (-b).
 
Imagine a few million electrons all trying to make their escape from the sphere at the same time. Their mutual repulsion would spread them uniformly around the sphere traveling in all directions. At a fundametal level, the resistance to the movement of a single charge is very complicated. It really only makes sense to talk about conductivity and resistivity in an average sense involving many charge carriers. That would be true even for a wire of uniform diameter. The simple conductivity relationship that is the basis for your caclulation is consistent with the observed average behavior when many charges are migrating through a conductor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K