MHB Compute Line Integral with Cauchy-Goursat Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Compute the following line integral. ∫a (z^2+3z+4)dz, where a is the circle |z|=2 oriented c-clockwise?
I'm not sure what the circle |z|=2 means, so I can't parametrize the circle.

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The function $f(z)=z^2+3z+4$ is holomorphic on $D=\mathbb{C}$ (simply connected) and $\gamma\equiv|z|=2$ (circle with center at the origin and radius 2) is contained in $D$. According to the Cauchy-Goursat theorem, $\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz=0$. Without using the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: we have the differential form: $$w=f(z)dz=(u+iv)(dx+idy)=\ldots=P(x,y)dx+Q(x,y)dy$$ The parametric equations of $\gamma$ are $x=2\cos t,\;y=2\sin t$ with $t\in[0,2\pi]$. Then, $$\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz=\int_{\gamma}w=\int_0^{2\pi}P(x(t),y(t))x'(t)dt+Q(x(t),y(t))y'(t)dt=\ldots=0$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top