MHB Compute the grade point average (GPA)

AI Thread Summary
To compute the GPA, the weighted average formula is applied using the grades and corresponding credit hours. The grades A, C, A, A, and B translate to quality points of 4, 2, 4, 4, and 3, respectively. The calculation involves multiplying each grade's quality points by its credit hours, resulting in a total of 41 quality points. The total credit hours sum to 14, leading to a GPA of approximately 2.93 when rounded to two decimal places. This method effectively demonstrates how to calculate GPA using weighted averages.
rainbow1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
a student earned grades of A, C, A, A, and B. Those courses had these corresponding numbers. of credit hours:1,6,3,1,3. The grading system assigns quality points to letter grades as follows: A=4, B=3, C=2, D=1, and F=0. Compute the grade point average (GPA) and round the result to two decimal places
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

What you want to use here is a weighted average:

$$\text{GPA}=\frac{1(4)+6(2)+3(4)+1(4)+3(3)}{1+6+3+1+3}=\frac{41}{14}\approx2.93$$

Does that make sense?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top