Computer Programmer going back to school for Physics

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a computer programmer seeking to transition into a physics degree due to a passion for problem-solving and math, despite lacking formal math and science education. The individual expresses a desire to engage in research programming within physics but is uncertain about the necessity of a PhD, considering a bachelor's degree as a more feasible option given personal circumstances. They are exploring areas like computational physics and computer modeling but are also open to other physics-related fields that leverage their programming skills. The conversation highlights the importance of finding fulfilling programming roles and suggests that engaging in more interesting projects could enhance job satisfaction. The participant acknowledges their long-standing love for programming and the need for a degree to advance their career, while also recognizing the challenges posed by their current educational background. Overall, the thread emphasizes the intersection of computer science and physics, particularly in research programming, and the potential pathways available for those with a programming background looking to enter the field of physics.
cpdavngr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It seems there are a lot of posts on here about people pursuing physics degrees without having a CS or programming background. However, I couldn't find any concerning people coming from the CS/Programming world looking to get into Physics.
This is me. :)
I'm a computer programmer who's looking to get a degree in physics. I already know computers inside and out and know many different programming languages and pick up on new ones very quickly. Unfortunately, I don't have the math and science knowledge (or bachelor's degree) to apply my IT knowledge and experience to what I really would like do which I believe is some sort of research programming. Although I never had it in high school, Physics interests me because I love solving problems, love math, and love learning new things and feel I could make some sort of positive contribution to this world by applying my knowledge to science. I currently work in a cube writing programs to generate financial reports for a large corporation. This is NOT what I'm interested in! ;)

Anyway, I've considered computational physics and computer modeling. Both of of these sound interesting and appropriate for me. However, I'm guessing there are many other things out there in the world of Physics for someone with CS experience that I haven't considered. I'm currently taking basic core requirements classes to transfer to another school. I'm now at the point where I need to figure out what direction I want to go.
Unfortunately, with a family and such, I'm not sure if I would have time to pursue a PhD so I'd probably end up with a bachelors. So here are my questions:

Do I need a PhD to do research programming? Can I get by with a Bachelor's?
What other areas of physics might I have overlooked that might be interesting to me?
Physics or Engineering? From what I've read, it sounds like engineering for me, but I'm not sure.
I'd welcome any other questions I may have overlooked.

Any thoughts would be appreciated. I apologize if I missed this type of post while searching through the forums.

Thanks in advance!

-Ralph :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did a physics degree, did some research programming (without the PhD), and then eventually wound up developing educational software for computer scientists -- no physics but it was actually more fun than the physics programming stuff! So maybe you just need a more interesting programming job. Or a change of attitude? Writing programs to generate financial reports involves a lot of the same things as writing physics programs -- you still have to do software design, debugging, etc. If you hate design, programming & debugging then maybe you need to get out of programming. If you like it, then just think about the programming and forget that it's aimed at a rather mundane product...
 
I guess I forgot to mention that I also LOVE programming. :) Always have since I was a kid. I was that guy in the computer department everyone would go to when they needed help with their programs because 90% of the IT students in my class hated programming.
Getting a more interesting programming job is what I'm trying to do. I had a few opportunities for more scientific programming jobs, but they all required much more advanced math and/or science skills than I had. I also only have a "specialized" associate degree from a computer tech school which is actually pretty useless when it comes to transferring credits to other schools, not to mention the fact that many employers look for Bachelor degrees or higher only.
My work is paying for me to go to school so my basic goal is to get a "normal" degree in anything and Physics and Mathematics seemed most interesting to me. I don't want to go the IT route because I already have 10 years of IT experience under my belt in various capacities.
BTW, developing educational software for computer scientists sounds wonderful!

Thanks!

-Ralph

mal4mac said:
I did a physics degree, did some research programming (without the PhD), and then eventually wound up developing educational software for computer scientists -- no physics but it was actually more fun than the physics programming stuff! So maybe you just need a more interesting programming job. Or a change of attitude? Writing programs to generate financial reports involves a lot of the same things as writing physics programs -- you still have to do software design, debugging, etc. If you hate design, programming & debugging then maybe you need to get out of programming. If you like it, then just think about the programming and forget that it's aimed at a rather mundane product...
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
585
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
818
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K