Computing flux through cylinder walls with gradient of radius squared

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IniquiTrance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Flux Integral
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 7K views
IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
To compute the flux integral over a cylinder's walls oriented along the z axis:

Can I do:

[tex]\int\int \vec{F}\cdot\nabla G(x,y,z) dA[/tex]

[tex]G(x,y,z) = r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\nabla G = <2x, 2y, 0>[/tex]

[tex]\int\int \vec{F}\cdot <2x,2y,0> dA[/tex]

Is this a correct approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IniquiTrance said:
To compute the flux integral over a cylinder's walls oriented along the z axis:

Can I do:

[tex]\int\int \vec{F}\cdot\nabla G(x,y,z) dA[/tex]

[tex]G(x,y,z) = r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\nabla G = <2x, 2y, 0>[/tex]

[tex]\int\int \vec{F}\cdot <2x,2y,0> dA[/tex]

Is this a correct approach?

Assuming a positive orientation, the easiest way to do it is by Divergence Theorem.

(1) Find the divergence of [tex]\vec{F}[/tex]

(2) Integrate this over the solid cylinder.

The other way is to split the cylinder into 3 pieces the Top, Bottom and Side and the sum the flux contributed from each piece.
 
~Death~ said:
Assuming a positive orientation, the easiest way to do it is by Divergence Theorem.

(1) Find the divergence of [tex]\vec{F}[/tex]

(2) Integrate this over the solid cylinder.

The other way is to split the cylinder into 3 pieces the Top, Bottom and Side and the sum the flux contributed from each piece.

Thanks for the reply.

Yeah, I specifically want to solve it as a flux integral without the div theorem.

Also know how to split it up. Is this a proper way to compute it over the cylinder walls though?