MHB Computing joint cumulative distribution function

Click For Summary
To compute the joint cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the exponential random variable X and Y = X^3, the correct formulation is F(x,y) = P(X ≤ x, Y ≤ y) = P(X ≤ x, X^3 ≤ y) = P(X ≤ min(x, y^{1/3})). The probability density function (PDF) for X is f_x(x) = λe^{-λx} for x ≥ 0. The PDF for Y is derived as f_y(y) = (λ/3)y^{-2/3}e^{-λy^{1/3}} for y ≥ 0. The next step involves integrating the joint PDF to find the joint CDF based on the established relationship. This process is essential for understanding the behavior of the random variables involved.
vincentvance
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
With X having the exponential $(\lambda)$ distribution and $Y = X^3$, how do I compute the joint cumulative distribution function?

Here is how far I've come:

$F(x,y) = P(X ≤ x, Y ≤ y) = P(X ≤ x, x^3 ≤ y) = P(X ≤ x, X ≤ y^{1/3}) = P(X ≤ min(x, y^{1/3})$,

$f_x(x) = \lambda e^{-\lambda x}$$ for $ x ≥ 0, 0 otherwise,

$f_y(y) = \lambda /3 y^{-2/3}e^{-\lambda y^{1/3}}$$ for $ y ≥ 0, 0 otherwise.

Now I have no idea how to continue...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

What you've done so far is correct:
vincentvance said:
$F(x,y) = P(X ≤ x, Y ≤ y) = P(X ≤ x, X^3 ≤ y) = P(X ≤ x, X ≤ y^{1/3}) = P(X ≤ \min(x, y^{1/3}))$,

We know that $X$ has an exponential distribution with parameter $\lambda$, hence the joint distribution is ...
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K