Concentrated Heat --> Efficiencies in Energy Production, How?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neuralnova
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Heat
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Concentrated heat can potentially enhance energy production efficiency by utilizing high-energy density conditions, particularly in solar panel applications. The discussion highlights the need for innovative designs and materials that can withstand higher temperatures, as traditional solar panels are optimized for normal conditions. While concentrated solar power can lead to increased heating and efficiency losses, it also opens avenues for research into materials that perform better under these conditions. Ultimately, rethinking solar panel design to optimize for higher temperatures may yield significant benefits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of concentrated solar power (CSP) technology
  • Knowledge of photovoltaic (PV) panel design and efficiency factors
  • Familiarity with semiconductor physics, particularly band gap concepts
  • Awareness of materials science related to high-temperature applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in high-temperature photovoltaic materials
  • Explore the design principles of concentrated solar power systems
  • Investigate cooling techniques for solar panels under concentrated heat
  • Learn about the implications of band gap reduction in semiconductors at elevated temperatures
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and developers in the renewable energy sector, particularly those focused on solar energy efficiency and materials innovation.

neuralnova
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In what scenarios might concentrated heat (high heat or energy per unit area or per unit volume) increase efficiency in energy production? Maybe it allows for useful sustainable superconduction conditions, or just for the operation of a high-fidelity photovoltaic collector that costs a lot to manufacture per square meter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Sorry to be blunt, but the reason I didn't respond is that the question is both vague and looks suspiciously like gibberish/technobabble. Looks like there are extra technical sounding words tossed in for no reason. Perhaps if you rephrase it would help...?
 
No problem, thanks for mentioning it--

We design solar panels to operate most efficiently under the conditions they usually encounter, which is to say, normal conditions on Earth's surface, which don't include heavily concentrated radiation. But say you're using large mirrors to concentrate a lot of radiation into a small area, where you'll then try to harvest it via a solar panel. Might this open doors in terms of design and materials? And if a project like that is on the table, mightn't it push some of our materials research in a different direction, focusing on materials that are efficient under conditions of higher energy density than those typically encountered by today's solar arrays?
 
The most obvious impact of concentrating solar power is you'll heat up the panel, which will cause it to be less efficient. So extra cooling would be a good idea. Sure, research could be done into different operating ranges, but I have been under the impression that heat is a fundamental problem for solar power efficiency. But it is possible that positive trade-offs can be made.
 
Isn't it true, though, that the fact that heating causing efficiency losses is an artifact of design? That is, we're currently designing solar panels to be most efficient at normal temperatures. What if we designed them to be most efficient at higher temperatures?
 
The solar constant irradiation is per unit area, so increasing the area of the collector has no beneficial effect on efficiency. PV are semiconductors which operating at higher temperatures will reduce the band gap.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
29K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K