1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Concentric conducting spherical shells cut by a horizontal plane

  1. Mar 9, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Wms5neQ.png

    A conducting spherical shell of outer radius a and inner radius 3a/4 is cut in two pieces via a horizontal plane a distance a/2 above the center of the spherical shell, as shown in Figure 1. Let us label "A" the upper part of the shell and "B" the lower part of the shell. The shell is initially uncharged and the two pieces that result from the cutting procedure remain in perfect electrical contact. A new conducting sphere of radius a/16 and total charge +Q is inserted in the shell and it is centered on the shell's center as shown in the same figure.

    (a) Are there any charge densities on the inner (r=3a/4) and outer (r=a) surfaces of the shell as well as within it? If yes, derive them.
    (b) What (if any) is the force per unit area on the inner and outer surfaces of the shell?
    (c) From now on we focus only on the "A" part of the shell: set up an integral that will yield the net force acting on the "A" part. What is its direction? Identify which variables you are integrating and what are the limits of integration. (You are not asked to perform the integration!)
    (d) Do the same as (c) for the inner shell of the "A" part of the shell.
    (e) Do the same as (c) for the "A" part as a whole.


    2. Relevant equations
    Gauss' Law (cgs): [tex]\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4\pi \rho[/tex]

    Poisson's equation (cgs): [tex]\nabla^2 \varphi = -4\pi \rho[/tex]


    3. The attempt at a solution
    I just don't even know where to start with this problem. I know without the horizontal plane I could apply Gauss' Law within the shell to see that a charge −Q must be distributed on the inside surface (the one at radius r=3a/4), and that it would be uniform by symmetry since the +Q charge is right in the center. But how would I even approach this with the horizontal surface there? Gauss' Law shows there should still be charge −Q along the inside of the shell and on the horizontal plane inside it, but no idea how it's distributed. Since the plane is not assumed to be a conductor the method of images wouldn't seem useful. I have no idea what the field should look like since the plane isn't necessarily an equipotential, and thus I can't assume the field is perpendicular to the plane. Anyone have some ideas as to how to start this problem that is laid out below? It's from problem set 3 of the 8.022 course from Fall 2004 on MIT OCW. Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 9, 2014 #2
    Ooops, bad title for the thread, as it's a conducting sphere inside a conducting spherical shell, the shell of thickness r/4. Not a sphere inside a shell inside another shell.
     
  4. Mar 9, 2014 #3
    Nevermind. I see the plane is just something to show how the spheres are cut, not something physically there.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2014
  5. Mar 12, 2014 #4
    I have gotten sidetracked from this problem for a couple of days, but back at it now. Can someone tell me if my solution so far is right?


    Part (a) By Gauss' Law there is a charge [itex]-Q[/itex] distributed on the inner surface (take a spherical Gaussian surface inside the actual shell, e.g., with [itex]3a/4 < r < a[/itex], where [itex]\mathbf{E} = \mathbf{0}[/itex], so that [itex]\mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{a} = 0[/itex]), and it's distributed uniformly by symmetry since it's a spherical conducting surface and the [itex]+Q[/itex] charge is at the center. Thus the charge density on the inner surface is

    \begin{equation}
    \sigma_{\text{inside}} = - \frac{Q}{4\pi(\tfrac{3}{4}a)^2} = -\frac{4Q}{9\pi a^2}.
    \end{equation}

    Since the shell is electrically neutral, there is also a charge [itex]+Q[/itex] on its outer surface. It is uniform since the outer surface is a sphere, so the charge density on the outer surface is

    \begin{equation}
    \sigma_{\text{outside}} = \frac{Q}{4\pi a^2}.
    \end{equation}
     
  6. Mar 12, 2014 #5
    Part (b) There is no net force on the inner nor outer surface of the entire sphere, due to symmetry.
     
  7. Mar 12, 2014 #6
    Part (c) I'm going to assume the question is asking for the net force on the outside surface of the A part of the shell. Let's use spherical coordinate with the origin at the center of the shell, so that the shell is parametrized as
    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{r} = a\sin{\theta}\cos{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{x}} + a\sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{y}} + a\cos{\theta}\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}
    \end{equation}
    for [itex]0 \leq \theta \leq \pi[/itex] and [itex]0 \leq \phi \leq 2\pi[/itex], where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the colatitude and [itex]\phi[/itex] is the longitude. For the outer surface the unit normal is
    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{n}_{\text{outer}} = \sin{\theta}\cos{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{x}} + \sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{y}} + \cos{\theta}\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}
    \end{equation}
    while for the inner it is
    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{n}_{\text{inner}} = -\mathbf{n}_{\text{outer}}.
    \end{equation}

    A differential area element of the sphere is given by
    \begin{equation}
    dS = a^2\sin{\theta}\,d\phi\,d\theta,
    \end{equation}
    and carries a charge
    \begin{align}
    dq & = \sigma_{\text{outside}}\,dS \\
    & = \frac{Q}{4\pi a^2}\,a^2\sin{\theta}\,d\phi\,d\theta \\
    & = \frac{Q}{4\pi}\,\sin{\theta}\,d\phi\,d\theta.
    \end{align}

    For the outer sphere, the differential force on the area element is
    \begin{align}
    d\mathbf{F} & = \frac{Q \, dq}{a^2} \mathbf{n}_{\text{outer}} \\
    & = \frac{Q^2}{4\pi a^2}\sin{\theta}\,d\phi\,d\theta\,\mathbf{n}_{\text{outer}} \\
    & = \frac{Q^2}{4\pi a^2}\,(\sin^2{\theta}\cos{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{x}} + \sin^2{\theta}\sin{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{y}} + \sin{\theta}\cos{\theta}\,\hat{\mathbf{z}})\,d\phi\,d\theta.
    \end{align}

    For the entire A section, the colatitude varies from [itex]\theta = 0[/itex] to [itex]\theta = \cos^{-1}(1/2) = \pi/3[/itex] (since [itex]\cos{\theta} = (a/2)/a = 1/2[/itex] at the maximum [itex]\theta[/itex]) and the longitude from [itex]\phi = 0[/itex] to [itex]\phi = 2\pi[/itex], so the net force acting on the outer surface of the A part of the sphere should be
    \begin{align}
    \mathbf{F} & = \int\!\!\!\! \int d\mathbf{F} \\
    & = \int_{0}^{\pi/3}\!\!\!\!\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{Q^2}{4\pi a^2}\,(\sin^2{\theta}\cos{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{x}} + \sin^2{\theta}\sin{\phi}\,\hat{\mathbf{y}} + \sin{\theta}\cos{\theta}\,\hat{\mathbf{z}})\,d\phi\,d\theta.
    \end{align}

    Does this look correct? The calculation for the force acting on the inner surface would be similar.
     
  8. Mar 12, 2014 #7
    The integral is pretty trivial to do, so I'll spare the details, but I get
    \begin{equation}
    \mathbf{F} = \frac{3Q^2}{16a^2}\,\hat{\mathbf{z}}
    \end{equation}
    for the force on the outside of the A part of the shell, which seems reasonable since it has positive charge on it that should repel the positive charge in the center and since the force components in the [itex]x, y[/itex] directions should cancel out due to symmetry.
     
  9. Mar 12, 2014 #8
    Then I'd just compute the force on the inner surface similarly, but a little messier since the distance from the center of the [itex]+Q[/itex] charge is [itex]3a/4[/itex] instead of [itex]a[/itex]. Then add that to the force on the outer and that gives the force on the entire A part, since there is no force due to the interior of the shell since there is no charge in it, as its a conductor; all the charge is on the surface.

    Is that correct, or am I screwing something up somewhere? Thanks.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2014
  10. Mar 12, 2014 #9
    Oops, I'd have to compute the force on the annulus that forms the boundary between the A and B parts of the sphere also. But is what I have for the outer part correct?
     
  11. Mar 12, 2014 #10
    I guess that annulus of boundary between A and B parts should have no net charge on it though, since A and B are hypothesized to be in perfect electrical contact.
     
  12. Jul 19, 2016 #11
    @homer I think that for part b), there is a net force/unit area on the inner surface due to the charge in the center. A for part c), I don't see why there should be any force on the outer surface unless we consider ONLY the corresponding inner surface and nothing else (no charge at center or the rest of the sphere considered). Did you ever resolve this?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Concentric conducting spherical shells cut by a horizontal plane
Loading...