• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Conceptual doubt - Rotating nonconducting ring

1,540
134
1. Homework Statement

Consider a non conducting ring of radius r and mass m which has a total charge q distributed uniformly on it.The ring is rotated about its axis with an angular speed ω.
a)Find the equivalent electric current in the circuit.
b)Find the magnetic moment μ of the ring.


2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I know how to solve this problem .But I am finding it difficult to understand whether a rotating charge actually constitutes a current.If we consider any cross section of the ring then it looks like charge passes through it.But the cross section itself is moving .

I found a thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=187946 somewhat related , especially post#5 by DaleSpam .But haven't been able to understand properly.

I would be grateful if someone could help me understand this.
 
Last edited:

ehild

Homework Helper
15,363
1,770
1. Homework Statement

Consider a non conducting ring of radius r and mass m which has a total charge q distributed uniformly on it.The ring is rotated about its axis with an angular speed ω.
a)Find the equivalent electric current in the circuit.
b)Find the magnetic moment μ of the ring.


2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I know how to solve this problem .But I am finding it difficult to understand whether a rotating charge actually constitutes a current.If we consider any cross section of the ring then it looks like charge passes through it.But the cross section itself is moving .
With respect to the ring, the charges do not move. but outside it, in the rest frame of reference, you have a region where moving charge is present. The current density function in the rest frame of reference is zero everywhere except a stationary torus which surrounds the rotating ring. Across each cross section of that stationary torus there is charge flowing through.

ehild
 
1,540
134
With respect to the ring, the charges do not move. but outside it, in the rest frame of reference, you have a region where moving charge is present. Across each cross section of that stationary torus there is charge flowing through.

ehild
I Agree . By rest frame I hope you mean lab frame.

The current density function in the rest frame of reference is zero everywhere except a stationary torus which surrounds the rotating ring.
Sorry ,I didn't understand this. What is current density function ? What is rest frame of reference here ?

My confusion is the definition of current - "Rate of flow of electric charge through a cross section of wire " .If we take any cross section of ring , there is no charge flowing through it .

Could you please help me understand what the mentor is conveying in https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1449312&postcount=5 ?
 
Last edited:

ehild

Homework Helper
15,363
1,770
It is function of the position and means i=dI/dA, current flowing across an unit area, perpendicularly to it.

Do not take the cross section of the rotating ring, ring, but the torus which contains the ring. Charge flows across the cross sections of the torus.
If the charge moves with the same velocity and direction as the cross section, it will not cross the cross section. There is no current inside the moving ring, but the moving ring causes current in the world outside.




ehild
 
1,540
134
1) Does that mean current is frame dependent?
2) In the definition of current, when we talk about cross sectional area, we mean a stationary cross section i.e
w.r.t ground .

Is it correct ?
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,901
4,727
1) Does that mean current is frame dependent?
2) In the definition of current, when we talk about cross sectional area, we mean a stationary cross section i.e
w.r.t ground .

Is it correct ?
Yes, and yes.
It follows that the perception of a magnetic field is also frame dependent.
 
1,540
134
Thank you very much.
 

ehild

Homework Helper
15,363
1,770
1) Does that mean current is frame dependent?
2) In the definition of current, when we talk about cross sectional area, we mean a stationary cross section i.e
w.r.t ground .

Is it correct ?
Current is charge transfer in a medium. It depends on the speed of charge with respect to the medium. Imagine you push a charged box across the table. No charge transfer happens inside the block, but charge is transferred across the table.

ehild
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,901
4,727
Current is charge transfer in a medium. It depends on the speed of charge with respect to the medium. Imagine you push a charged box across the table. No charge transfer happens inside the block, but charge is transferred across the table.

ehild
I don't think you're being quite consistent. If you define current as movement of charge wrt the medium then moving a charged object does not constitute a current. Surely it's the movement wrt the observer.
 

ehild

Homework Helper
15,363
1,770
I don't think you're being quite consistent. If you define current as movement of charge wrt the medium then moving a charged object does not constitute a current. Surely it's the movement wrt the observer.
I did not mean current in general, but current in a medium.
When you speak about electric current you always specify the medium it flows. Current flows in a wire. Electrons fly from the cathode to the anode in a cathode-ray tube: it means current flowing in the cathode-ray tube. The current in a medium is the charge transferred across a cross section in unit time in that medium. The current in the wire or in the cathode-ray tube are the same either they are in rest in the lab or moving.
If you move a charged rod inside a tube, there is no current in the rod, but there is current in the tube, either you, the observer, are in rest with respect to the tube or moving with respect to it. In the OP, the medium where the current flows is the laboratory itself.

ehild
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,901
4,727
I did not mean current in general, but current in a medium.
When you speak about electric current you always specify the medium it flows. Current flows in a wire. Electrons fly from the cathode to the anode in a cathode-ray tube: it means current flowing in the cathode-ray tube. The current in a medium is the charge transferred across a cross section in unit time in that medium. The current in the wire or in the cathode-ray tube are the same either they are in rest in the lab or moving.
If you move a charged rod inside a tube, there is no current in the rod, but there is current in the tube, either you, the observer, are in rest with respect to the tube or moving with respect to it. In the OP, the medium where the current flows is the laboratory itself.

ehild
OK, I suppose, but it doesn't seem a very useful way to think about it. If I have a current flowing in a wire, and next to that I have a magnet moving with the same velocity as the electrons, the magnet will not sense the current. So what benefit is there in thinking of the current as being wrt the medium rather than wrt the observer?
 

ehild

Homework Helper
15,363
1,770
OK, I suppose, but it doesn't seem a very useful way to think about it. If I have a current flowing in a wire, and next to that I have a magnet moving with the same velocity as the electrons, the magnet will not sense the current. So what benefit is there in thinking of the current as being wrt the medium rather than wrt the observer?
Imagine you connect a lamp to the supply with a two-wire cable. (The two wires are very close together in the cable)
Certainly, there is current flowing in the wires, as the lamp lights. Does any charge flowing across any cross section in the room ? Has it sense to say that 1 A current flows in the room?

In your problem, the current induces magnetic field around the wire in the lab frame of reference. It will certainly act to the moving magnet. I am not sure if that interaction ceases when the magnet moves with the same velocity as the charge carriers inside the wire. But I know next to nothing about electrodynamics of moving bodies.
ehild
 
Last edited:

rude man

Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
7,533
675
Getting back to the OP's original post:
Think of 2 situations:
1. A stationary ring carrying current: the observer sees charges buzzing around the ring.
2. A rotating ring with stationary charges within the ring: the observer sees charges buzzing around the ring.

So to the observer the two situations are indistinguishable from each other electrically. Kind of like Einstein's elevator Gedankenexperiment with gravity & acceleration being indistinguishable.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Conceptual doubt - Rotating nonconducting ring" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Conceptual doubt - Rotating nonconducting ring

  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
497
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
459
Replies
8
Views
708
Replies
9
Views
431
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
752
Top