Conceptual Issue Dealing With Atmospheric Pressure

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a steel cube floating on mercury, with considerations of atmospheric pressure and buoyancy. Participants explore the implications of pressure in fluid mechanics, particularly how atmospheric pressure affects both the cube and the surrounding mercury.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumption that atmospheric pressure has cancelling effects on the forces acting on the steel cube and the mercury. Questions arise regarding the mathematical interpretation of pressure in relation to area and force, as well as the relationship between velocity and pressure in fluid dynamics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the nature of pressure and its effects in this context. Some have provided insights into the mechanics of pressure transmission and the behavior of fluid molecules, while others continue to question and explore these concepts without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the mathematical relationships governing pressure and force, particularly in relation to varying areas and velocities in fluid systems. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of these concepts, particularly for those new to the topic.

ScareCrow271828
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1m^3 steel cube is to be floated on mercury (specific gravity=13.6). On each side of the cube there is a 5mm clearance. Assume that the container is open to atmospheric pressure at 100kPA. Find the mass of the mercury.

Homework Equations


P=F/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I sum-mated the forces in the vertical direction and combined that with an equation for buoyancy. Then I solved for the height of the mercury around the cube, found the volume of the mercury and multiplied it by its density.

My question is: is it right to assume that atmospheric pressure has cancelling effects because it pushes down the steel cube but also pushes down the mercury which would push the steel cube back up? This makes sense conceptually to me, but I am having trouble understanding that since P∝1/A. It seems like by that equation atmospheric pressure would have different effects on the block and on the mercury.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScareCrow271828 said:
atmospheric pressure has cancelling effects because it pushes down the steel cube but also pushes down the mercury
Yes, it cancels. Can you go into more detail on why you think it would not cancel?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller and ScareCrow271828
haruspex said:
Yes, it cancels. Can you go into more detail on why you think it would not cancel?

Thank you! That was my intuition I am trouble understanding how atmospheric pressure acts as a pressure -or at least has units of pressure (Pa)- but in this case seems to act independent of area. By P=F/A shouldn't pressure be dependent on area. Or more specifically Inversely proportional to area?

Ive always thought of pressure as kind of a deform-able blanket that covers and weighs everything evenly so it makes sense to me conceptually. I am just having trouble understanding it mathematically. Wouldn't there be a greater force due to the atmosphere if the pressure was over a greater area since F∝PA?

Another question if you could:
Mass flow rate is equal to the product of density, velocity,and area or ⋅m=ρA∨. Therefore if area is decreased velocity has to increase. The increase in velocity makes sense to me but it seems like that would also increase the pressure since pressure is dependent on the force that molecules exert on surfaces. How would shooting molecules at a higher speed not increase that force? But by Bernoullis equation ∨∝1/P? How does increasing the velocity and therefore decreasing the pressure make any sense conceptually?

Sorry for the simple questions
 
ScareCrow271828 said:
Wouldn't there be a greater force due to the atmosphere if the pressure was over a greater area since F∝PA?
Yes, there is a greater force over the upper surface of the cube than there is on the surrounding margin of mercury. But the force on the mercury is transmitted straight down to the bottom end of that margin, i.e. to the level of the base of the cube. At that point, the pressure infinitesimally above the level must equal that immediately below, and that pressure must also be the same all across the underside of the cube. So the force on the underside of the cube due to the atmosphere is the same as that on the top surface.
ScareCrow271828 said:
How would shooting molecules at a higher speed not increase that force?
The movement of the molecules does not create the pressure difference. Rather, the pressure difference accelerates the molecules. If there is a reduction in area in a pipe, the molecules must accelerate as they transit to the narrower section, so the pressure must be greater before the narrowing than after. If it widens again later, the pressure difference goes the other way to slow them down again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ScareCrow271828
haruspex said:
Yes, there is a greater force over the upper surface of the cube than there is on the surrounding margin of mercury. But the force on the mercury is transmitted straight down to the bottom end of that margin, i.e. to the level of the base of the cube. At that point, the pressure infinitesimally above the level must equal that immediately below, and that pressure must also be the same all across the underside of the cube. So the force on the underside of the cube due to the atmosphere is the same as that on the top surface.

The movement of the molecules does not create the pressure difference. Rather, the pressure difference accelerates the molecules. If there is a reduction in area in a pipe, the molecules must accelerate as they transit to the narrower section, so the pressure must be greater before the narrowing than after. If it widens again later, the pressure difference goes the other way to slow them down again.
Great! Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K