Conceptual Topology & Manifolds books

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on recommendations for books that introduce the fundamentals of topology and manifolds, emphasizing conceptual understanding rather than rigorous proofs. Participants explore various texts that may provide intuitive insights into the subject matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks books that provide conceptual explanations of topology and manifolds without a focus on proofs.
  • Another participant suggests "The Shape of Space" but expresses skepticism about finding a truly conceptual book that avoids proofs, noting the abstract nature of point-set topology.
  • A different participant mentions Griffiths' "Surfaces" as an intuitive option, highlighting its use of simple language and examples like the Konigsberg bridge problem and the Euler characteristic.
  • Crossley's "Essential Topology" is noted for including some proofs but not being overly rigorous, with the participant suggesting that finding a book without proofs may be challenging.
  • Prasolov's "Intuitive Topology" is recommended based on a brief look inside, along with "Algebraic Topology: An Intuitive Approach" and Armstrong's "Basic Topology" as potential fits for the request.
  • Hilbert and Cohn Vossen's "Geometry and the Imagination" is mentioned for its chapter on topology, and historical references are suggested as a way to understand the evolution of the field, including works by Riemann and Mobius.
  • One participant notes the historical context of topology, indicating that its study predates modern point-set topology and suggests looking into Poincare's early papers for additional insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the availability of conceptual books without proofs, with some suggesting that such resources may be limited. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best options for achieving the desired conceptual understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the abstract nature of topology and the potential necessity of proofs for deeper understanding, indicating that the search for purely conceptual texts may face limitations.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0
I am looking for books that introduce the fundamentals
of topology or manifolds. Not looking for proofs and rigor.
Something that steps through fundamental theorems in the
field, but gives conceptual explanations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the closest thing I can think of is "The Shape of Space":

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0824707095/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Most of the material in point-set Topology is very abstract and often non-intuitive. I doubt you will find a "conceptual" book that "steps through fundamental theorems" because you really need the proofs to get anywhere.
 
One intuitive book is Griffiths' Surfaces a few theorems such as the Konigsberg bridge problem and the Euler characteristic are demonstrated in simple language along with non-orientable surfaces and so on.

Crossley's Essential Topology unfortunately includes some proofs but is not big on rigor. I suspect that it will be difficult to find a book that doesn't have some proofs.
 
You could try Prasolov's Intuitive Topology. I haven't read it, but I took a look inside and it seems like that sort of thing.

There's also a book, Algebraic Topology: An Intuitive Approach.

Armstrong: Basic Topology has an introduction along the lines you have in mind.

Hilbert and Cohn Vossen's book, Geometry and the Imagination has a chapter on topology.

Another thing you might try is to look at historical references. It should be kept in mind that the study of topology really precedes point-set topology in its modern form. One of the earliest results was the classification of surfaces by Riemann and Mobius, independently, back in the 19th century. Whereas, I think point-set sort of reached a pretty modern form in the 1920s. Another interesting thing to look at, which I haven't done yet, is to read Poincare's old papers. Also predating point-set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K