Conceptual understanding of circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual understanding of circular motion, specifically the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force in a scenario involving a person in circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore why centripetal force is not equal to the weight of the person, questioning the forces acting on the individual in circular motion. They discuss the equations related to centripetal force and the distinction between weight and the normal force experienced by the person.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the definitions and roles of different forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of forces in the context of circular motion, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion stemming from the terminology used in the textbook, particularly regarding the definition of weight and the normal force in non-rotational versus rotational contexts.

cmwilli
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/37/capturebg.jpg



a=v^2/r
v=2pir/T
f=ma



So I already have the answers to all the questions. The problem I am having is I don't understand why the centripetal force is not equal to the weight of the person. If it isn't the weight what force, other than gravity, is acting on him that would be called the centripetal force.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cmwilli! :smile:
cmwilli said:
… I don't understand why the centripetal force is not equal to the weight of the person. If it isn't the weight what force, other than gravity, is acting on him that would be called the centripetal force.

i think the book is correct, but rather confusing

the F = ma equation for the radial (vertical) direction, for someone standing on the ground, is mg - N = mv2/r

the total centripetal force is the LHS, mg - N (so, for no rotation, it would be zero), but the weight (ie, what would show up if he was standing on a weighing machine) is the reaction force N, which is less than mg

the book is confusing because we usually call mg the weight, although technically our weight is what we feel, ie the reaction force, N, against us (which is usually the same as mg, but not in this case!) :smile:
 
What does LHS mean?
 
Left-hand side! :biggrin:

(of the equation)
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K