Concerning spherical Bessel and Neumann functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the transformation of the Schrödinger equation into spherical coordinates, specifically focusing on the substitution of variables and the derivation of solutions involving spherical Bessel and Neumann functions. Participants explore the mathematical steps necessary to reformulate the equation and identify the resulting functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to replace Rnl(r) with rho and how to derive Neumann functions and spherical Bessel functions.
  • Another participant notes that the answer to the first question depends on the definition of rho.
  • It is suggested that rho can be substituted for (k*r) where k is defined in terms of energy and other constants.
  • Participants discuss the reformulation of the differential equation and the implications of the potential function on the solution.
  • One participant provides a specific form of the reformed equation and notes the absence of the potential term.
  • There is a suggestion that the potential is assumed to be zero for simplicity, which leads to a focus on free particle solutions.
  • Some participants express confusion about the clarity of the original problem and the need for more explicit details.
  • One participant confirms that substituting rho leads to a new differential equation whose solution involves a combination of Bessel and Neumann functions.
  • A later reply provides hints on how to handle derivatives when changing variables, emphasizing the relationship between the original and transformed variables.
  • Finally, one participant expresses satisfaction with the progress made in understanding the transformation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement on the mathematical transformations involved but also express differing levels of clarity regarding the problem statement and the specifics of the potential function. The discussion remains somewhat unresolved as participants seek further clarification on certain steps.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of explicit definitions for rho and the potential function, as well as unresolved mathematical steps in the transformation process. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding among participants regarding the derivation of solutions.

moriheru
Messages
273
Reaction score
16
When transforming the Schrödinger equation into sphericall coordinates one usually substitutes
psi(r,theta,phi) into the equation and ends up with something like this:

-h(bar)^2/2m* d^2/dr^2*[rR(r)]+[V(r)+(l(l+1)*h(bar)^2)/2mr^2]*[rR(r)]=E[r R(r)]

Question 1: How do I replace the Rnl(r) with rho?
Question 2: How do I get to Neumann functions and spherical Bessel?

Sorry for the top equation! Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1. depends on what rho is.
Q2. You explicitly state the potential function and solve the equation.
 
On Q1
One substitutes rho for (k*r) where k is 2mE^1/2/h(bar). Yet where is the kr does one reform the equation to get kr?
On Q2
By reforming the equation with rho one gets a new differential equation and the solution is a combination of bessel and neumann. The question is how do I get there
 
Last edited:
You get the kr from the solution, not the DE. You may need ##k=\frac{2m}{\hbar}\sqrt{E-V}## instead ;)
To get a solution, you need an explicit form for V(r).

See, for example, the atomic energy levels or a spherical infinite square well. (Look them up.)
If you suspect that the solution is a combination of specific functions, you can use their form as your proposed solution.
 
The reformed equation looks like this

d^2R(rho)/d(rho)^2+2/(rho)*dR(rho)/d(rho)+[1-l(l+1)/rho^2] R(rho)=0

and the solution is said to be:

R(rho)=Aj(rho)+Bn(rho) A and B are constants

and j(rho) are the spherical bessel functions
 
d^2R(rho)/d(rho)^2+2/(rho)*dR(rho)/d(rho)+[1-l(l+1)/rho^2] R(rho)=0
That would be: $$\frac{d^2}{d\rho^2} R(\rho) +\frac{2}{\rho}\frac{d}{d\rho} R(\rho) + \left[\frac{1-l(l+1)}{\rho^2}\right] R(\rho) = 0$$

Notice how there is no ##V## in the reformed equation? Where did it go?
Notice how the form of the DE? Look familiar?

However:
There is not enough information to help you.
Please state the complete problem.
 
I think I have got it Rnl(r) where nl is the subscript and l the angular quantum number gamma max If I remember correctly, has the index n and one can remove the n and so Rnl(r) becomes Rl(kr)??
 
The potential is assumed to be zero, to keep things simple.
 
So you are finding the wavefunction for a free particle in spherical coordinates?
 
  • #10
I am trying to solve for the radial part of the spherical Schrödinger equation (BTW thanks for all replies this is a hellish question!).
 
  • #11
moriheru said:
By reforming the equation with rho one gets a new differential equation and the solution is a combination of bessel and neumann. The question is how do I get there

Do you mean: "How do I rewrite the Schrödinger equation so it uses rho instead of r?" or "How do I solve the rewritten Schrödinger equation?"
 
  • #12
Actually both but first of all the first. But I think the first can be answerd by looking at the index of the R?!
 
  • #13
I have just written the deriviation so things may be clearer:

8e68702e9a85d609b6af5b46ae2e7b66.png


inserting the spherical laplacian

Epsi(r)=-h(bar)^2/2m(1/rd^2/dr^2r-(1/h(bar)^2r^2)L^2-h(bar)^2/2m*1/r*d^2/dr^2*rpsi(r)+1/2mr^2L^2psi(r)+V(r)psi(r)=E *psi(r)

substituting psi(r,theta,phi)
gives the above...
 
  • #14
You need to be more clear - it seems that you're trying to find the solutions of the Schrödinger equation in a region with a zero or constant potential, but people are having to read your mind.

moriheru said:
On Q1
One substitutes rho for (k*r) where k is 2mE^1/2/h(bar). Yet where is the kr does one reform the equation to get kr?
On Q2
By reforming the equation with rho one gets a new differential equation and the solution is a combination of bessel and neumann. The question is how do I get there

In your first post, you said that you have:

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}\left( rR(r) \right) + \left( \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} \right)rR(r) = ErR(r) \\<br /> \Rightarrow -\frac{\hbar^2}{2mE}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}R(r) - \frac{\hbar^2}{mEr}\frac{d}{dr}R(r) + \left( \frac{\hbar^2}{2mE}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2} - 1 \right)R(r) = 0[/tex]

where I've carried out the derivative, divided by Er, I'm only considering V=0 in this problem (since I'm pretty sure this is what you want). Now you want to substitute [itex]\rho = kr = (\sqrt{2mE}/\hbar)r[/itex]. This is straight-forward for the last part in the parenthesis, so I'm guessing you're just having trouble with the derivative terms. I'll give you a big hint by reminding you of how changing coordinates changes derivatives (this is basically the product rule):

[tex]\frac{d}{dr} = \frac{d\rho}{dr} \frac{d}{d\rho} = k\frac{d}{d\rho}[/tex]

Using this for the derivative terms should give you what you're looking for.
 
  • #15
Yes it works thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K