Conditional expectations related to count of event occurring kth time

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the joint probability mass function (pmf) of T1 and T3, where T1 follows a geometric distribution and T3 is modeled as a negative binomial distribution, specifically NBin(3, p). The participant expresses uncertainty about finding the joint pmf but believes that establishing it will lead to the conditional pmf of T3 given T1 and vice versa. They explore the relationship between T1, T2, and T3, noting the order statistics and suggesting that this might provide a solution pathway. The calculations for expected values given certain conditions are discussed, confirming that the approach to finding E(T1 | T3=5) is correct, emphasizing the importance of understanding the negative binomial distribution's context in their calculations.
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
Independent repetitions of an experiment are performed. ##A## is an event that occurs with probability ##p##, ##0<p<1##. Let ##T_k## be the number of the performance at which ##A## occurs the ##k##th time, ##k=1,2,\ldots##. Compute
(a) ##E(T_3\mid T_1=5)##,
(b) ##E(T_1\mid T_3=5)##.
Relevant Equations
I think the relevant distributions here are the geometric and negative binomial distributions, i.e. the number of trials until first success and the number of trials with ##n## successes respectively.
I am stuck at obtaining the joint pmf of ##T_3## and ##T_1##. It is clear I think that ##T_1\in\text{Ge}(p)##, where the pmf of ##T_1## is given by ##p(1-p)^{k-1}##, ##k=1,2,\ldots##. Now, the negative binomial distribution counts the number of trials with ##n## successes and with success probability ##p##. So I would say ##T_2## and ##T_3## are ##\text{NBin}(2,p)## and ##\text{NBin}(3,p)## respectively. I also know of the fact that ##\text{NBin}(n,p)## is just a sum of ##n## geometrically independent distributed random variables with success probability ##p##.

Yet I do not know how to find the joint pmf of ##T_1## and ##T_3##. If I can find that, then I have the conditional pmf of ##T_3## given ##T_1## and vice versa. Then I think I'd be able to solve both (a) and (b).

Also, this exercise does appear in a chapter on order statistics, and I notice that ##T_1\leq T_2\leq T_3##, so I'm curious if one could solve it using one of those methods as well (I think this is the way it's intended to be solved).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I've worked out an answer. I am not 100% sure about my answer. Also, I am not using order statistics at all (perhaps there is some slick way of doing it using order statistics).

Anyway, for a), if we assume ##T_3\in \text{NBin}(3,p)##, then ##T_3=X_1+X_2+X_3## where ##X_i\in\text{Ge}(p)## are independent with expectation ##1/p##. I would guess e.g. ##X_1=T_1## and so \begin{align*}E(T_3\mid T_1=5)&=E(X_1+X_2+X_3\mid X_1=5)\\ &=E(5+X_2+X_3)\\ &=5+\frac2p.\end{align*} For b), we observe that ##E(X_1\mid X_1+\ldots+X_n=x)=\frac{x}{n}## if ##X_1,\ldots,X_n## are iid (for proof, see here). Then simply $$E(T_1\mid T_3=5)=E(X_1\mid X_1+X_2+X_3=5)=\frac53.$$
 
b) is correct. It is enough to note that ## n E(X_i | S_n) = S_n ## for all ##i##. It's a routine check that sum of iid geometric variables is negative binomial.

side note: when making calculations, one should take care with the distribution of NB: do we count the number of trials until ##k## successes or the number of failures until ##k## successes.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...