Conductor with shell problem getting zero as answer?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a cylindrical cable with a copper outer tube and an inner wire, focusing on charge distribution and surface charge density. Participants clarify how charge arranges itself on the outer tube, emphasizing that the outer surface should have a positive charge due to the inner wire's negative charge. The surface charge density at the outer surface of the tube is calculated using the formula σ=q/A, but one participant initially arrives at zero, prompting confusion. Further analysis reveals that the calculations were incorrect, leading to a better understanding of the charge distribution. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying formulas in electrostatics problems.
AGGENGR
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
1. Problem Statement:

The figure shows a cross-section view of a very long cylindrical cable. There is an outer tube
made of copper, inner radius 2R, outer radius 4R. The inner copper wire has radius R and is
concentric with the tube. The inner wire has charge density –2λ (per unit length), while the tube
carries total charge +λ. [You need to show solution method to get full credit on this problem!]
(a) How does the charge arrange itself on the outer tube? On outside of course!
b) What is the surface charge density (σ) at the outer surface of the tube, at 4R? Getting zero for this one?

2. Homework Equations
sigma=q/A

3. Work.
So I used the above formula and got zero for some odd reason. I calculated the sigma inner and that's what giving me zero. Work is attached in jpeg.
 

Attachments

  • 20140927_154940.jpg
    20140927_154940.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Check... \frac{\lambda - 4\lambda \pi R}{8 \pi R} \neq \frac{\lambda-\lambda}{2}.
 
  • Like
Likes AGGENGR
Ahhh makes sense now. Thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
851
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K