Conflict of interests results in lies?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter seang
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion regarding whether R² is a subspace of R³ in the context of Electrical Engineering and Linear Algebra courses. The professor in the EE class asserts that R² is indeed a subspace of R³, while the Linear Algebra instructor argues against this, emphasizing the importance of isomorphism. The key takeaway is that R² can be isomorphic to a subspace of R³, but it is not a subspace in the strictest sense due to the dimensionality of the tuples involved. This highlights the nuanced understanding required in vector space theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their dimensions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of isomorphism in linear algebra
  • Basic knowledge of linear independence and spanning sets
  • Distinction between theoretical Linear Algebra and application-oriented matrix algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vector space isomorphism in detail
  • Learn about subspaces and their properties in linear algebra
  • Explore the differences between theoretical Linear Algebra and matrix algebra applications
  • Investigate the implications of dimensionality in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of Electrical Engineering, Linear Algebra instructors, and anyone seeking clarity on the relationship between different vector spaces and their subspaces.

seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am currently studying Electrical Engineering. I have this class where we quickly go over selected math topics which will be oft used in our careers.

I'm also enrolled in Linear Algebra (not matrix algebra. The difference at my school is that Linear Algebra is based much more around proofs and theory, and matrix algebra is more application oriented; I'm not sure if this is the case most places.).

Anyway in my EE class, one of the topics was linear algebra. We basically learned everything we learned in my linear algebra class minus proofs and orthogonality.

So let me get to the point here. There was a true/false question on my EE exam that asked whether R2 was a subspace of R3. The answer accoring to my prof was true. However I remember my linear algebra teacher explaining to us why it wasn't. What's the story? Our linear algebra teacher said something about isomorphism, which we didn't cover in my linear algebra class, so I couldn't really argue much with my EE teacher.

Any clarification?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a vector space isomorphic to R^3, then there are infinitely many non equal subspaces all isomorphic to R^2 - any choice of two linearly independent vectors will span one. However, there is in one sense no such thing as 'the vector space R^3', or 'the vector space R^2', though we often ignore this fact. The class of real vector spaces of dimension 3 is not even a set. So it is moot to ask 'is R^2 a subspace of R^3'. It is true, and no one can argue with this, that given a vector space of dimension n over a field F, then there are subspaces of dimension m for all 0<=m<=n.
 
Last edited:
If by R^2, you mean a 2-dimensional vector space over R, and by R^3, you mean a 3-dimensional vector space over R, then the correct statement is that R^2 is isomorphic to a subspace of R^3 (one possible isomorphism is mapping all pairs (x, y) to 3-tuples (x, y, 0)), but R^2 is obviously not itself a subspace of R^3, since R^2 consists of 2-tuples and R^3 consists of 3-tuples.
There will be a lot more glossing over of isomorphisms when talking about physics/engineering.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
942
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K