Confused about my frisbee (flight dynamics)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kenewbie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Dynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the flight dynamics of frisbees compared to stones, emphasizing that frisbees remain airborne longer due to aerodynamic lift generated by their shape and angle of attack. When thrown with sufficient speed and an upward angle, the frisbee experiences lower pressure above its curved surface, allowing it to counteract gravity. The conversation highlights the importance of forward speed and effective angle of attack in producing lift, and mentions that even flat plates can glide under the right conditions, although they tend to roll more than frisbees.

PREREQUISITES
  • Aerodynamics principles
  • Understanding of lift and drag forces
  • Knowledge of angle of attack
  • Familiarity with frisbee and aerobie design differences
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of lift on aircraft wings
  • Study the effects of angle of attack on flight dynamics
  • Explore the differences in design between frisbees and aerobie
  • Investigate the physics of drag and its impact on gliding objects
USEFUL FOR

Aerodynamics enthusiasts, physics students, frisbee players, and anyone interested in the principles of flight dynamics and object motion.

kenewbie
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
If I simply drop a stone, it takes s seconds to hit the ground. If I throw the stone parallel to the ground, it also takes s seconds to hit the ground, regardless of horizontal momentum.

However, if I throw my frisbee it will be airborne for much longer than it does when I drop it, even if I throw it parallel to the ground. In fact, the harder I throw, the longer it stays in the air.

Why? I would guess that it floats on the air somehow? Or perhaps, when I say that I throw it parallel to the ground, it has just enough upward angle to gain the same amount of lift as gravity is pulling it down, and so they cancel each other until i loose momentum.

But if that is the case, it leaves the question of how the lift is generated. I've read that you get low pressure on the top of the disk due to the rounded rim (rounded upwards) but would not that simply make MORE of the air go ABOVE the disk, and so make it HIGH pressure compared to below?

Enlighten me, please!

k
 
Science news on Phys.org
You are correct that there is an aerodynamic force acting against gravity. As for how the lift is generated, there are several threads. Search for lift on aircraft wings, and you'll get a ton of hits, many of them filled with contraversy. The key to the expalnation you've aparently heard (about the rounded top), is that the curve makes the air go faster over the top, and faster moving air has lower pressure.
 
kenewbie said:
When I say that I throw it parallel to the ground, it has just enough upward angle to gain ... lift
Upward angle is correct. It's the combination of forward speed and effective angle of attack that produces lift. The shape reduces the drag, but even a flat plate (no curve) will fly, and a frisbee thrown upside down with enough speed and angle of attack will glide for a short while, although the flat plate will tend to roll more. A frisbee rolls a little. An aerobie doesn't roll (if properly "tuned"), is much thinner and glides much further than a frisbee.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobie

A somewhat recent thread about lift from an airplane wing.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=247336
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K