MHB Confused by Spherical Wedge Graphing on z-y Plane

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
View attachment 4461

Part (a) is easy to do by setting up a triple integral, but for part (b), I was a bit confused by the diagram provided by the solutions manual:
View attachment 4462

Why is the spherical wedge (shaded) graphed on the z-y axis? In the most general case, shouldn't the two lines that form angle $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ be arbitrarily placed (such that $\phi < \pi /2$) and not necessarily lying on the z-y plane? Since it is to my understanding that $\phi$ is measured from the positive z-axis in any direction away from it, or did they draw it on the z-y plane for illustrative purposes?
 

Attachments

  • Spherical Wedge.PNG
    Spherical Wedge.PNG
    12.6 KB · Views: 101
  • photo(2).JPG
    photo(2).JPG
    7.9 KB · Views: 106
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Rido! (Smile)

You're quite right. Those lines represent cones that have a fixed angle with the z axis.
Indeed, it's for illustrative purposes that only the intersection with the z-y-plane has been drawn. (Wasntme)
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top