Confusing integral in Zee's QFT

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integral transformation in Zee's Quantum Field Theory (QFT) text, specifically the transition from equation (4) to (5) in chapter I.4. The integral W(J) is evaluated by first integrating over y^0, which introduces a delta function δ(k^0). This delta function simplifies the integral by setting k^0 to zero, leading to the transformation of k^2 - m^2 + iε into ω^2 = k^2 + m^2. The participants clarify that the negative sign cancels out, confirming the validity of the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and delta functions
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly in the context of integrals
  • Basic grasp of Fourier transforms and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of delta functions in integrals
  • Learn about the role of complex variables in Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Investigate the use of Fourier transforms in solving differential equations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory, as well as mathematicians interested in the application of integrals and delta functions in physical contexts.

waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
This is probably really simple. In chapter I.4 the jump from (4) -> (5) is sort of eluding

W(J) = - \iint dx^0 dy^0 \int \frac{dk^0}{2\pi} e^{i k^0(x - y)^0} \int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{k}(\vec{x_1} - \vec{x_2})}} {k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon}

and

\omega^2 = \vec{k}^2 + m^2


He got

W(J) = \int dx^0 \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{k} (\vec{x_1} - \vec{x_2})}}{\vec{k}^2 + m^2}


the way I see it - the middle term is the delta function

W(J) = - \iint dx^0 dy^0 \delta(x^0 - y^0) \int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{k}(\vec{x_1} - \vec{x_2})}} {k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon}

but how does it disappear, and how does

k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon turn into

\vec{k}^2 + m^2

k^0 would be the \omega

but somehow this doesn't add up.

so just wondering if anyone could give a pointer on how to solve this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<br /> W(J) = - \iint dx^0 dy^0 \int \frac{dk^0}{2\pi} e^{i k^0(x - y)^0} \int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{e^{i \vec{k}(\vec{x_1} - \vec{x_2})}} {k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon} <br />

To do this integral, he integrated over y0 first. That produces a delta function \delta(k_0). Then he integrated over k0, and because of the delta function, this just sets k0 equal to zero everywhere.

k^2-m^2 if written out is k0^2-k^2-m^2, so if k0 is zero, then that writes out to -(k^2+m^2), which cancels the negative sign.
 
Took a while to convince myself, but yes it makes sense. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K