I Confusion about derivation of equation in Gregory

  • Thread starter Thread starter terahertz
  • Start date Start date
terahertz
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Classical Mechanics, Douglas Gregory
Can anyone tell me how Gregory gets equation 1.14 from equation 1.13?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you upload a pic of that page? Use the "Attach files" link below the Edit window. Thanks.
 
Sure...

20251121_194240.webp
 
Looks like Taylor expansions for ##\cos## and ##\sin##
 
terahertz said:
TL;DR: Classical Mechanics, Douglas Gregory

Can anyone tell me how Gregory gets equation 1.14 from equation 1.13?
The way I would look at it, he actually gets equation 1.13 from 1.14 (using Taylor expansions). I.e.:
$$\kappa^{-1} \sin(\kappa s) = \kappa^{-1}(\kappa s - \frac{\kappa^3 s^3}{3!} + \dots) = s - \frac{\kappa^2}{3!}s^3 + \dots$$And:
$$\kappa^{-1}(1 - \cos(\kappa s)) = \kappa^{-1}(\frac{\kappa^2 s^2}{2!} - \frac{\kappa^4 s^4}{4!} \dots) = \frac 1 2 \kappa s^2 - \frac{\kappa^3 s^4}{4!} + \dots$$In my experience, physicists have this somewhat curious tendency to work backwards without saying so. For me, personally, it seems odd. But, you have to get used to it.
 
Last edited:
The following formulas are useful. Try to get them by yourself. Suppose we have a curve ##\boldsymbol r=\boldsymbol r(s).## And let a a point slides along this curve in accordance with the law of motion ##s=s(t).## Then the velocity of the point is
$$\boldsymbol v=\dot s\boldsymbol t(s(t));$$
the acceleration of the point is
$$\boldsymbol a=\ddot s\boldsymbol t(s(t))+\dot s^2 \kappa(s(t))\boldsymbol n(s(t)).$$
The last formula explains why ##1/\kappa## is called the radius of curvature as well.
Another useful exercise is to find the angular velocity of the Frenet frame in such a motion.
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
339