Undergrad Confusion about derivation of equation in Gregory

  • Thread starter Thread starter terahertz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of equation 1.14 from equation 1.13 in Douglas Gregory's work, highlighting the use of Taylor expansions for sine and cosine functions. It suggests that equation 1.13 is actually derived from equation 1.14, emphasizing the backward approach often taken by physicists. The conversation also touches on the velocity and acceleration of a point moving along a curve, introducing relevant formulas for these concepts. Additionally, it explains the significance of the curvature radius in relation to motion along a curve. Understanding these derivations and formulas is essential for grasping the underlying mechanics discussed in Gregory's text.
terahertz
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Classical Mechanics, Douglas Gregory
Can anyone tell me how Gregory gets equation 1.14 from equation 1.13?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you upload a pic of that page? Use the "Attach files" link below the Edit window. Thanks.
 
Sure...

20251121_194240.webp
 
Looks like Taylor expansions for ##\cos## and ##\sin##
 
terahertz said:
TL;DR: Classical Mechanics, Douglas Gregory

Can anyone tell me how Gregory gets equation 1.14 from equation 1.13?
The way I would look at it, he actually gets equation 1.13 from 1.14 (using Taylor expansions). I.e.:
$$\kappa^{-1} \sin(\kappa s) = \kappa^{-1}(\kappa s - \frac{\kappa^3 s^3}{3!} + \dots) = s - \frac{\kappa^2}{3!}s^3 + \dots$$And:
$$\kappa^{-1}(1 - \cos(\kappa s)) = \kappa^{-1}(\frac{\kappa^2 s^2}{2!} - \frac{\kappa^4 s^4}{4!} \dots) = \frac 1 2 \kappa s^2 - \frac{\kappa^3 s^4}{4!} + \dots$$In my experience, physicists have this somewhat curious tendency to work backwards without saying so. For me, personally, it seems odd. But, you have to get used to it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes terahertz and TSny
The following formulas are useful. Try to get them by yourself. Suppose we have a curve ##\boldsymbol r=\boldsymbol r(s).## And let a a point slides along this curve in accordance with the law of motion ##s=s(t).## Then the velocity of the point is
$$\boldsymbol v=\dot s\boldsymbol t(s(t));$$
the acceleration of the point is
$$\boldsymbol a=\ddot s\boldsymbol t(s(t))+\dot s^2 \kappa(s(t))\boldsymbol n(s(t)).$$
The last formula explains why ##1/\kappa## is called the radius of curvature as well.
Another useful exercise is to find the angular velocity of the Frenet frame in such a motion.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes terahertz and PeroK
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
511