MHB Confusion in proof involving lim and liminf

  • Thread starter Thread starter oblixps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Proof
oblixps
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
In a proof showing that the vector space of all functions from a metric space X to the complex numbers C is complete under the supremum norm, there was a line near the end that i was confused about.

starting here:
\(sup|f - fn| \leq liminf_{m \to +\infty} ||f_n - f_m|| \)

the next step then is to take the limit as n approaches infinite on both sides.

Since we are assuming that {f_n} is Cauchy I know that the limit as m, n approach infinite of ||fn - fm|| is 0.

However, the very next line says that the right hand side is 0. so in other words, [math]lim_{n \to +\infty} liminf_{m \to +\infty} ||f_n - f_m|| = 0[/math]. i feel that it is a bit of a jump from the previous line and it isn't entirely obvious to me why this line is true.

Could someone help fill in the missing step or two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean the vector space of bounded functions on this metric space?
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K