Confusion with how to calculate acceleration in this problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the average net force required to bring a 1500kg car to rest from a speed of 27.8m/s within a distance of 55m. The subject area includes concepts of kinematics and dynamics, particularly focusing on acceleration and force calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to calculate acceleration, questioning the validity of using average speed to determine time. There is a discussion about the implications of non-constant acceleration on the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions made in the calculations. Some have pointed out the need for constant acceleration to apply certain formulas, while others are exploring alternative approaches, such as energy considerations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity in the problem regarding the assumption of constant acceleration, which affects the applicability of the formulas discussed. Participants express confusion over the relationship between average velocity and time in the context of changing speeds.

Frankenstein19
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What average net force is required to bring a 1500kg car to rest from a speed of 27.8m/s within a distance of 55m?

Homework Equations


v^2=vo^2+2ad
vf-vo/(time elapsed)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know I need to calculate the acceleration first, so immediately I thought of taking the distance and dividing it by the speed in order to get time, doing that I got 1.92s.

Then when I put the velocity over that time to get the acceleration, I thought i would get the correct acceleration but no. I got -14.48 and the book says its -7. The book uses the formula v^2=vo^2+2ad

Now, my question is: Why doesn't t work my way. Please don't tell me, it's much easier if you use the v^2 formula because I still won't understand since my question is why doesn't the way I thought work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankenstein19 said:
dividing it by the speed in order to get time
Ah ! but the speed is gradually decreasing all the way to zero !
 
So I can't just do vf-vi/(v/s)? I'd get 0-55m/(28.7m/s)
 
When you divide distance by time, You are getting the average velocity. it is the average distance that this person cuts over time. Also that time that you got through that method is just the time that this average (constant) velocity will take to pass this distance. In another way, that time assume that the velocity over this distance is constant (doesn't change). If there is no acceleration then you can use this method.However as BvU mentioned it is decreasing. You are not cutting the same distances over time. So as a result you can't get time through d/v.

Can you explain your equation above? (Vf-vi)/v/s?
 
Others have pointed out the error in your calculation. I would just like to add a couple of points.
Frankenstein19 said:
What average net force is required to bring a 1500kg car to rest from a speed of 27.8m/s within a distance of 55m?
Frankenstein19 said:
The book uses the formula v^2=vo^2+2ad
The question should have specified constant acceleration, and therefore a constant force, making the qualifier 'average' redundant.
Average force is defined as ##\frac{\Delta p}{\Delta t}=\frac{\int F.dt}{\int .dt}##, where p is momentum. This is consistent with average acceleration, ##\frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}=\frac{\int a.dt}{\int .dt}##.
You need the acceleration to be constant in order to be able to apply ##v^2=v_o^2+2ad##.
With non-constant acceleration, we could slow the car to 1m/s in 0.5s (-53.6m/s2), then bring it to rest in 95.6s at a uniform acceleration of -0.01m/s2.
The average acceleration would be -27.8/(.5+95.6)=-0.29m/s2, much less than for constant acceleration.
Frankenstein19 said:
I know I need to calculate the acceleration first
That's one way, but it's not the only way. You could arrive at the same answer by considering energy. Again, this is only valid for constant force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
995
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K