Congruence of the sum of terms in a reduced residue system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the sum of terms in a reduced residue system {r1, r2, ..., rx} modulo m equals zero, where x = φ(m) and m > 2. The proof is established for odd m and m = 2k (k odd), while challenges arise for m with higher powers of 2 as a divisor. Key insights include the relationship between gcd(a, m) and gcd(m-a, m), leading to the conclusion that the elements can be paired to sum to m, ultimately demonstrating that 2(r1 + r2 + ... + rx) = 0 mod m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of reduced residue systems
  • Familiarity with Euler's totient function φ(m)
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic
  • Concept of greatest common divisor (gcd)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study properties of Euler's totient function φ(m) in detail
  • Explore modular arithmetic techniques for even and odd integers
  • Investigate the implications of gcd properties in number theory
  • Learn about pairing techniques in combinatorial proofs
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and educators in number theory, mathematicians focusing on modular arithmetic, and anyone interested in advanced proof techniques related to reduced residue systems.

reyomit
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if {r1,r2,...rx} is a reduced residue system mod m (where x=\phi(m), m>2), then
r1 + r2 + ... + rx= 0 mod m.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been able to prove it pretty simply for odd m and for m=2k where k is odd, but for m with higher powers of 2 as a divisor I'm stuck.
Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If gcd(a,m)=1, what can you say about gcd(m-a,m)?
 
I see that (a,m)=1 immediately implies that (m-a,m)=1,and used that to prove that
2(r1 + r2 + ... +rx) = 0 mod m.

Then when m is odd 2 has a multiplicative inverse mod m, and we can just multiply by that to get r1 + r2 + ... +rx = 0 mod m.

But when m is even, I'm not totally sure, what to do.
 
Let me be more explicit, using that (m-a,a)=1 whenever (m,a)=1, I concluded
(m-r1)+(m-r2)+...+(m-rx)=r1+...+rx mod m
and also
(m-r1)+(m-r2)+...+(m-rx)= -r1-r2-...-rx mod m.

So -(r1+...+rx)=r1+...+rx mod m
or 2(r1+...+rx)=0 mod m.
 
You're making it a little more complex than it is. First, notice that phi(m) is even for m>2. Then if gcd(a,m)=1, then gcd(m-a,m)=1 (as you found), so that both a and m-a are in the reduced residue system.

So, you can split the elements of the reduced residue system into pairs, each of which sums to m.
 
I feel much the fool.
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K