Can Fibonacci Sequences Be Proven Using This Conjecture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramsey2879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Numbers
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the product of a specific sequence defined by A_1 = 3 and A_n = A_{n-1}^{2} - 2, and Fibonacci numbers, specifically that the product equals F_{2^{n+1}}. Participants reference two key identities involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers that could facilitate this proof. The identities are F_{2n} = L_{n}F_{n} and L_{2n} = L_{n}^{2} - 2(-1)^{n}, with L_n representing the nth Lucas numbers. Closed form expressions for Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, including Binet's formula, are suggested as accessible resources for proving these identities. The conversation seeks existing proofs or references related to these mathematical relationships.
ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
Given A_1 = 3 \texttt{ and } A_n = A_{n-1}^{2} -2; is there a way to prove the following:

\prod_{i=1}^{n}A_{i} = F_{2^{n+1}}

or if someone has already proven this, can you give the reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note of is relation can be found at the first comment re the sequence 3,7,47 ... See http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A001566" , but I would like a proof if it is known.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These two identities should get you there.

<br /> F_{2n}=L_{n}F_{n}<br />

<br /> L_{2n}=L_{n}^{2}-2(-1)^{n}<br />

Where L_n is the nth Lucas numbers.
 
MrJB said:
These two identities should get you there.

<br /> F_{2n}=L_{n}F_{n}<br />

<br /> L_{2n}=L_{n}^{2}-2(-1)^{n}<br />

Where L_n is the nth Lucas numbers.
Where can I find a proof of those identities?
 
Both identities can be proven using the closed form expressions for the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. The closed form expressions should be easily accessible. The one for the Fibonacci numbers is also known as Binet's formula.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K