Connected Sum of Orientable Manifolds is Orientable

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The connected sum of two orientable manifolds, denoted as M and M', is indeed orientable when approached from the perspective of simplicial homology. By selecting complementary orientations on the cycles C and C' during the gluing process, the boundaries cancel out, preserving the orientations of the remaining parts of the manifolds. This conclusion is supported by the example of gluing two squares along a common edge while reversing the orientation of one edge, demonstrating that the resulting manifold M#M' maintains orientability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Simplicial Homology concepts
  • Understanding of orientable manifolds
  • Knowledge of cycles and boundaries in topology
  • Familiarity with fundamental cycles and their orientations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simplicial complexes in topology
  • Learn about the implications of orientability in higher-dimensional manifolds
  • Explore the concept of fundamental classes in homology
  • Investigate examples of connected sums in various dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and manifold theory, as well as students and researchers interested in the properties of orientable manifolds and simplicial homology.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, All:
I am trying to show that the connected sum of orientable manifolds M,M' is orientable , i.e., can be given an orientation. I am using the perspective from Simplicial Homology.

Consider the perspective of simplicial homology, for orientable manifolds M,M', glued about cycles C,C' respectively. The idea is that we can use the original orientations and then select orientations on C,C', so that they cancel each other out when glued together, and then the remaining orientations on (M-C) and (M'-C') remain the same. Still, I guess I am assumming that manifolds are simplicial complexes; I don't know if we need any additional condition like, e.g., C^1 or higher.


Assume WOLG that M,M' are both connected: if an m-manifold M is orientable , this means

that the top cycle --call it m'-- can be assigned a coherent orientation, so that m' is a cycle -

-that does not bound, since m is the highest dimension--, i.e., the net boundary of m

cancels out , e.g., in the simplest case of a loop with boundary a-a=0. This means m', which

represents M itself, is a non-trivial cycle, which generates the top homology class. If your

coefficient ring is Z, then the top homology will be Z; consider going n-times about the

cycle. Now, the key is that the two orientable manifolds can be glued so that, at the circle of

gluing, the total boundary cancels out, and the resulting manifold M#M' is still orientable. As

a specific example, consider a square a,b,c,d, with arrows going all in the same direction, so

that the net boundary is : (b-a)+(c-b)+(d-c)+(a-d)=(b-b)+(a-a)+(c-c)+(d-d)=0 . Now glue a

second square a',b',c',d' along a common edge, (say (b,c) with (b',c')), but reverse the

orientation of the edge (b',c') in M when gluing, and notice how the simplex resulting from

the gluing also has net boundary zero.

Now, the key general point is that , at the cycle C where we collapse M with M', we change

the orientation of C in either M or M', so that, along the common cycle, where you are doing

the gluing, the respective boundaries cancel each other out, and the remaining orientations

of M-C and M-C' remain the same, so that M#M' is orientable.


Does this Work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bacle said:
Hi, All:
I am trying to show that the connected sum of orientable manifolds M,M' is orientable , i.e., can be given an orientation. I am using the perspective from Simplicial Homology.

Consider the perspective of simplicial homology, for orientable manifolds M,M', glued about cycles C,C' respectively. The idea is that we can use the original orientations and then select orientations on C,C', so that they cancel each other out when glued together, and then the remaining orientations on (M-C) and (M'-C') remain the same. Still, I guess I am assumming that manifolds are simplicial complexes; I don't know if we need any additional condition like, e.g., C^1 or higher. Assume WOLG that M,M' are both connected: if an m-manifold M is orientable , this means

that the top cycle --call it m'-- can be assigned a coherent orientation, so that m' is a cycle -

-that does not bound, since m is the highest dimension--, i.e., the net boundary of m

cancels out , e.g., in the simplest case of a loop with boundary a-a=0. This means m', which

represents M itself, is a non-trivial cycle, which generates the top homology class. If your

coefficient ring is Z, then the top homology will be Z; consider going n-times about the

cycle. Now, the key is that the two orientable manifolds can be glued so that, at the circle of

gluing, the total boundary cancels out, and the resulting manifold M#M' is still orientable. As

a specific example, consider a square a,b,c,d, with arrows going all in the same direction, so

that the net boundary is : (b-a)+(c-b)+(d-c)+(a-d)=(b-b)+(a-a)+(c-c)+(d-d)=0 . Now glue a

second square a',b',c',d' along a common edge, (say (b,c) with (b',c')), but reverse the

orientation of the edge (b',c') in M when gluing, and notice how the simplex resulting from

the gluing also has net boundary zero.

Now, the key general point is that , at the cycle C where we collapse M with M', we change

the orientation of C in either M or M', so that, along the common cycle, where you are doing

the gluing, the respective boundaries cancel each other out, and the remaining orientations

of M-C and M-C' remain the same, so that M#M' is orientable.Does this Work?

This seems right.

If the manifold is orientable then the boundary of the fundamental cycle minus an n-simplex is the boundary of that removed n-simplex with the induced orientation. In the connected sum the two boundaries of the two removed n-simplices cancel if you choose them to have complimentary orientations and so again you get a fundamental cycle.
 
Thanks for your patience in going over a messy proof, Lavinia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K