Connection between Pressure, Surface Density and Height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a lab experiment analyzing the relationship between pressure, surface density, and bounce height of a basketball. The first part determined that 9 PSI is the optimal pressure for bounce height, while the second part explored how different surface densities affect the bounce, resulting in a logarithmic relationship. The experimenter seeks supporting equations from physics to validate their findings, particularly for the second part involving surface density. A suggestion is made to consider how other factors, like material properties, might influence bounce height beyond density alone. The conversation emphasizes the need for relevant equations to support the experimental conclusions.
Whtbrd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
[Mentors' note: moved from technical forums so no template]

Hi All,

Working on a lab write-up, and I need background equations to support the reasoning for my experiment.

To outline briefly, two-part experiment, first part was finding the ideal pressure for a basketball, where I inflated it, dropped it, and used a data-logger to see the height it returned to. This provided me with results that showed 9PSI was ideal, from a test of 8PSI-10PSI (+0.5)

Second part, was using my ideal pressure, dropping the ball on different surfaces, based on their density (g/m^3), this has given me a logarithmic equation, which makes sense, as the higher density, the ball will bounce higher, but won't bounce higher than it started at.

Basically, looking for any supporting equations found by physicists that can prove this should work, particularly for part 2. Guessing it'll look something like displacement=Height/(Pressure, Density), with pressure and density in the denominator.

If anyone has any equations that they think will be helpful, please link to an article on them.

Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whtbrd said:
dropping the ball on different surfaces, based on their density
How can you be sure they don’t differ in other ways that might be more important? Water is denser than wood, but my guess is it would bounce higher off the wood (depending on temperature).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top