I've noticed lots of interesting properties of the patterns of numbers in the Fibbonacci sequence that can be expressed as the sum of two squares. In fact, it's what got me into number theory in the first place. There seem to be no two adjacent entries that are not the sum of two squares- and it seems that no sum of two squares is surrounded by two entries that are not.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So, formally:

1) There exists no entry in the Fibbonacci sequence F(n) such that neither F(n) or F(n+1) are the sum of two squares

2) There an infinite number of n that F(n), F(n-1) and F(n+1) are all the sum of two squares.

Less formally:

Why do numbers that are the sum of two squares 'like' to group together in twos and threes?

Why do numbers that are not the sum of two squares like to be apart from each other?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Consecutive Numbers in the Fibbonacci Sequence and Sums of Two Squares

Loading...

Similar Threads - Consecutive Numbers Fibbonacci | Date |
---|---|

A Equation with three consecutive prime numbers | Apr 11, 2016 |

Consecutive linear map & PCA | Oct 9, 2013 |

The product of 8 consecutive natural numbers will not be a perfect square? | May 29, 2012 |

Do complex number have anything like consecutive numbers? | Nov 24, 2011 |

Divisibility question; consecutive numbers | Jul 6, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**