Consensus about Non-Locality & Spacetime

Click For Summary
The current consensus on non-locality and spacetime suggests that the wave function may not represent a physical entity, leading to the idea that there is nothing in spacetime to be non-local about. This perspective encourages treating wave functions and spacetime as mere equations, potentially sidelining the need for a physical interpretation. However, debates continue regarding whether wave functions are ontological or epistemological, with implications for the nature of reality and locality. Some interpretations propose that hidden variables could reconcile local and non-local views, while others argue for the necessity of understanding the observer's role in quantum mechanics. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of these concepts and the ongoing search for clarity in understanding the relationship between quantum mechanics and spacetime.

Similar threads

A Do entanglement networks encode a unique, local historical record?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Locality and Wave Function Collapse Implications
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Wave function of particle / quantum field in space, also in time?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
B QFT & QM Questions (about time, locality, gravity, etc.)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
How does QFT handle non-locality?
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
11K
I Discussion about quantum mechanics and spacetime
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Pilot Wave Theory & Non-Locality
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
B Is spacetime a quantum error correcting code?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Explicit non-local form for the vector potential?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
What are the basic mathematical objects in QFT?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K