Conservation laws during particle decay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation laws during particle decay, specifically addressing energy and momentum conservation. It is established that the total energy of the output particles equals the energy of the input particle, adhering to conservation principles. The decay process is characterized as a quantum measurement event only in limited cases, where the byproducts provide certain information. The conversation concludes that if initial momentum is known precisely, the conservation equation Momentum_in = Momentum_out is obeyed without inherent quantum fuzziness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave function collapse
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in physics, specifically energy and momentum conservation
  • Familiarity with particle decay processes and their implications
  • Awareness of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Research experimental methods for measuring particle momentum and energy
  • Study the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its effects on particle measurements
  • Investigate various types of particle decay and their conservation laws
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in particle physics and the implications of conservation laws during particle decay.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
359
Reaction score
33
I believe that conservation laws, like for energy and momentum, are obeyed during the particle decay process, e.g. the total energy of the new output particles is equal to the energy of the one input particle. But is that relationship subject to quantum fuzziness? Suppose we, somehow, prepare a coherent source of freely traveling massive particles. Then after some time, these particles each decay into two other particles. Is this decay process a quantum measurement event - does the wave function of the input particle collapse so that we are dealing with actual precise values of say energy when that energy is transferred to the two output particles?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
Is this decay process a quantum measurement event - does the wave function of the input particle collapse so that we are dealing with actual precise values of say energy when that energy is transferred to the two output particles?

The decay is only a measurement in the limited case as we learn something about the byproducts. When a neutron ejects an electron, you know you have a proton and a neutrino running around somewhere. That much is certain. Values for other properties do not collapse or otherwise take on well-defined values. So without knowing the initial momentum precisely, the child particles will not suddenly have certain values for momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
DrChinese said:
The decay is only a measurement in the limited case as we learn something about the byproducts. When a neutron ejects an electron, you know you have a proton and a neutrino running around somewhere. That much is certain. Values for other properties do not collapse or otherwise take on well-defined values. So without knowing the initial momentum precisely, the child particles will not suddenly have certain values for momentum.
Ok, thanks.

I guess I have a followup question: Suppose we know the initial momentum precisely. Is the conservation equation Momentum_in = Momentum_out obeyed precisely or is it subject to inherent quantum fuzziness do to the HUP, etc.?
 
referframe said:
Ok, thanks.

I guess I have a followup question: Suppose we know the initial momentum precisely. Is the conservation equation Momentum_in = Momentum_out obeyed precisely or is it subject to inherent quantum fuzziness do to the HUP, etc.?

I would say precisely. (In the sense that you measure both.)

If you knew Momentum_In precisely, and measured a child's Momentum precisely, you would also know the other child's Momentum precisely. And you could confirm that by experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
834
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K