Conservation laws in rotational movement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation laws in rotational movement, specifically analyzing the motion of a uniform rod pivoted at one end. The original poster presents a scenario where the rod falls from a vertical position and seeks to determine the angular acceleration as it passes through a horizontal position and the angular speed as it reaches a vertical position.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply torque and rotational dynamics equations to find angular acceleration and speed. Some participants question the correctness of the calculations, particularly regarding the inclusion of gravitational factors and the interpretation of height in energy conservation.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing clarification regarding the calculations and assumptions made by the original poster. Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, and the original poster has acknowledged mistakes and adjusted their reasoning. The discussion is exploring different interpretations of the problem setup and the implications of using conservation of energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the significance of the initial position of the rod and its effect on the calculations. There is also a focus on ensuring clarity in notation and the definitions of variables used in the equations.

MPat
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a uniform rod of mass 12kg and length 1.0m. At it's end the rod is attached to a fixed, friction free pivot. Initially the rod is balanced vertically above the pivot and begins to fall (from rest) as shown in the diagram. Determine,
a) the angular acceleration of the rod as it passes through the horizontal at B. (rod is horizontal with left end at pivot point)
b) the angular speed of the rod as it passes through the vertical at C. (rod is vertical with upper end at pivot point)

For the diagram picture a clock with hand pointing to 12 (for position A, initial position), 3 for position B, 6 for position C.

Given:
m=12kg
L= 1.0m

Homework Equations


τ = Iα
PE = mgh
KE (rotational) = 1/2Iω^2
Irod = 1/3ml^2

The Attempt at a Solution


a) α=?
τ = Iα
τ = rF, F = mg, τ = rmg, r=L/2 since center of mass will be at centre of rod
τ=L/2*mg
Iα=1/3ml^
L/2*mg =1/3ml^
Solve for α
m cancels out
3L/2L^2 = α
L cancels out
3/2L=α
3/2(1)= α = 1.5 rad/s^2

b) ω=?
mgh=KE
mgL/2=1/2(1/3ML^2)ω^2
mass cancels out
6gL/2L^2 = ω^2
3g/2L = ω^2
ω= sqrt (3*9.8/2*1)
ω = 5.42 rad/s

I'm just not sure if I got the answer correct. Is someone able to check? Was a little unsure of what numbers I was using as radius and center of mass.

Thanks

Miral
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You lost a factor g somewhere in the calculation of the acceleration. This would have been obvious if you would have included the units, because the left side is a length and the right side is an angular acceleration - they cannot be equal.

How did you find h in (b)?Concerning the notation: Things like 1/2L are problematic: is it 1/(2L) or (1/2)L? Usually the latter - if the L is supposed to be in the denominator, you should write 1/(2L).
 
mfb said:
You lost a factor g somewhere in the calculation of the acceleration. This would have been obvious if you would have included the units, because the left side is a length and the right side is an angular acceleration - they cannot be equal.

How did you find h in (b)?Concerning the notation: Things like 1/2L are problematic: is it 1/(2L) or (1/2)L? Usually the latter - if the L is supposed to be in the denominator, you should write 1/(2L).
Whoops! You're totally right. I lost a g in there.

L/2*mg =1/3ml^
Solve for α
m cancels out
3Lg/2L^2 = α
L cancels out
(3g)/(2L)=α
3(9.8)/2(1)= α = 14.7 rad/s^2Found the h or change in h by taking half of the length of the rod. L=1.0m, H = L/2
If the rod is starting at position B with rod horizontal, gravity acts on the center of mass, the change in height from position B to C is therefore 0.5m or L/2.

Does that look better?
 
MPat said:
If the rod is starting at position B with rod horizontal
I don't think it is. I don't see the diagram, but the starting position should be "12" at the clock.

(a) looks better now.
 
mfb said:
I don't think it is. I don't see the diagram, but the starting position should be "12" at the clock.

(a) looks better now.
Ohhh...I think I see your point. If my starting point was B then the rod would have already gained some KE from A to B. So if I use conservation of energy and start at position A, the height would be 1.0m. mgh (point A) = KE (point C).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K