How Does Torque Apply to a Rotating Rod on a Frictionless Surface?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a uniform rod released from rest on a frictionless horizontal surface, initially at an angle of 60° with the horizontal. Participants are exploring the acceleration of the center of mass of the rod immediately after release, considering the effects of torque and angular acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the rod and the validity of using torque equations about the point of contact. There is uncertainty about the applicability of certain equations due to the accelerating point of contact. Questions arise regarding the relationship between angular acceleration and the acceleration of the center of mass, as well as the nature of motion at the point of contact.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using the center of mass for torque calculations, despite the acceleration of the center of mass. There is an ongoing exploration of kinematic relationships and clarification of concepts related to internal forces within the rod.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves understanding the dynamics of a rotating rod and the implications of forces acting on it, particularly in the context of a frictionless surface. There is a recognition of the complexity introduced by the non-fixed axis of rotation.

Ethidium
Messages
3
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A uniform rod is released on a friction-less horizontal surface from rest. Initially, the rod makes an angle θ = 60° with the horizontal. What is the acceleration of the center of mass of the rod, just after release?

Homework Equations


Torque = Moment of Inertia × Angular acceleration
Angular acceleration α = dω/dt = d2θ/dt2
Mg - N = Ma, where M is the mass of the rod, a is the acceleration about the rod's center of mass and N is the normal reaction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The only two forces acting on the rod: the normal reaction by the surface and the weight of the rod.
Finding torque about the point of contact with the surface, we get: (M is mass of the rod, L is it's length)
Mg(L/2)cosθ = ⅓(ML2)α ..... (1)
Also if we balance forces, we get: (a is the acceleration of centre of mass of the rod, N is the normal reaction)
Mg - N = Ma ...(2)

Now I realize that the axis of rotation is not fixed and thus wonder how to go about using equation (1). I also cannot use a condition of pure rotation such as a = rα. I'm guessing I will get a second order differential equation by virtue of the fact that α = d2(θ)/dt2.
So, Mg(L/2)cosθ = ⅓ML2(d2θ/dt2)
⇒ secθ d2θ/dt2 = (3g)/(2L)
Am I required to solve this differential equation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
Ethidium said:
Finding torque about the point of contact with the surface, we get: (M is mass of the rod, L is it's length)
Mg(L/2)cosθ = ⅓(ML2)α ..... (1)
Also if we balance forces, we get: (a is the acceleration of centre of mass of the rod, N is the normal reaction)
Mg - N = Ma ...(2)

Now I realize that the axis of rotation is not fixed and thus wonder how to go about using equation (1).
Equation (1) is not valid, as you suspect. The point of contact is itself accelerating. However, it can be shown that ##\tau = I \alpha## is valid about the center of mass even though the center of mass is accelerating! Love that center of mass. :oldsmile:

You will also need to find a kinematic relationship between ##\alpha## and the acceleration of the center of mass.

You will not need to solve a differential equation. You just need to find the acceleration of the center of mass immediately after release.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethidium and PeroK
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Equation (1) is not valid, as you suspect. The point of contact is itself accelerating. However, it can be shown that ##\tau = I \alpha## is valid about the center of mass even though the center of mass is accelerating! Love that center of mass. :oldsmile:

You will also need to find a kinematic relationship between ##\alpha## and the acceleration of the center of mass.

You will not need to solve a differential equation. You just need to find the acceleration of the center of mass immediately after release.
Thanks a lo
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Equation (1) is not valid, as you suspect. The point of contact is itself accelerating. However, it can be shown that ##\tau = I \alpha## is valid about the center of mass even though the center of mass is accelerating! Love that center of mass. :oldsmile:

You will also need to find a kinematic relationship between ##\alpha## and the acceleration of the center of mass.

You will not need to solve a differential equation. You just need to find the acceleration of the center of mass immediately after release.
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Equation (1) is not valid, as you suspect. The point of contact is itself accelerating. However, it can be shown that ##\tau = I \alpha## is valid about the center of mass even though the center of mass is accelerating! Love that center of mass. :oldsmile:

You will also need to find a kinematic relationship between ##\alpha## and the acceleration of the center of mass.

You will not need to solve a differential equation. You just need to find the acceleration of the center of mass immediately after release.
Thanks a lot. I will try finding the kinematic relationship.
I was also confused about another thing (it is a bit silly). The point of contact is accelerating horizontally right? But how exactly is it accelerating if there is no net horizontal force on it? The only forces acting on it are vertical.
 
Ethidium said:
Thanks a loThanks a lot. I will try finding the kinematic relationship.
I was also confused about another thing (it is a bit silly). The point of contact is accelerating horizontally right? But how exactly is it accelerating if there is no net horizontal force on it? The only forces acting on it are vertical.

The bar has internal forces between its molecules. There can produce motion in a direction for which there is no external force.

For example, a rotating bar may have no external forces, but each point in the bar is executing circular motion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethidium
PeroK said:
The bar has internal forces between its molecules. There can produce motion in a direction for which there is no external force.

For example, a rotating bar may have no external forces, but each point in the bar is executing circular motion.
Ahhh right. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K