- 42,791
- 10,490
Right. The final challenges are to calculate I correctly for the rod plus block, and express the ΔGPE as a function of the angle.i_hate_math said:w=sqrt(2gh)/d
use energy conservation, so delta(GPE)=1/2Iw^2?
The discussion focuses on solving a conservation of angular momentum problem involving a 0.235 kg block sliding down a frictionless surface and colliding with a 0.470 kg vertical rod. The key equations used include angular momentum (L=I*w), linear momentum (P=mv), and energy conservation principles. The participants clarify the need to apply conservation laws correctly, particularly noting that angular acceleration (alpha) is not constant during the pivoting motion. The final goal is to determine the angle θ that the rod makes after the collision, which is calculated using energy conservation and moment of inertia considerations.
PREREQUISITESPhysics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics and rotational motion, particularly in the context of collisions and energy conservation.
Right. The final challenges are to calculate I correctly for the rod plus block, and express the ΔGPE as a function of the angle.i_hate_math said:w=sqrt(2gh)/d
use energy conservation, so delta(GPE)=1/2Iw^2?
soz w=sqrt(2gh)/d i meanti_hate_math said:okay,
now w=sqrt(mgh)/d
mgl=0.5Iw^2, where l is change in height
and by subing in all the mess l=h
and then ø=arccos[(d-h)/d]=36.8
I mean after subing in all the values, i got l=h, or did i do the wrong calculations?kinemath said:l is not equal to h
L=(0.5I*w^2)/mgkinemath said:How did you get l=h?
After the collison, mechanical energy is conservedkinemath said:Hmm... I don't think energy is conserved as it is an inelastic collision.
Right, though we will have to be careful not to confuse l (lower case L,)with I (uppercase I). To avoid confusion I'll write H for the change in height and Imom for moment of inertia. Also, the m in there should be for the mass of the rod plus block, not just the block, and H is the change in height of the mass centre of that combination. We will return to that later.i_hate_math said:now w=sqrt(2gh)/d
mgl=0.5Iw^2, where l is change in height
Since the block is treated as a particle, the Imom would be 1/3mw^2 right?haruspex said:Right, though we will have to be careful not to confuse l (lower case L,)with I (uppercase I). To avoid confusion I'll write H for the change in height and Imom for moment of inertia. Also, the m in there should be for the mass of the rod plus block, not just the block, and H is the change in height of the mass centre of that combination. We will return to that later.
As I said, you next need to figure out the right value for Imom. This is for the rod and block as a combined system. Think carefully.
(1/3)(m+M)w^2 is what i meant.i_hate_math said:Since the block is treated as a particle, the Imom would be 1/3mw^2 right?
First, you don't mean w2, I hope. A moment of inertia is a mass multiplied by the square of a distance.i_hate_math said:(1/3)(m+M)w^2 is what i meant.
Please do not spoon-feed @i_hate_math. He/she needs to get the hang of figuring these things out.Let'sthink said:Let ω be the instantaneous angular velocity of the rod as well as the stuck block about the pivot just after impact.
Te expression for angular momentum of rod + block just after impact {(Md²/3) + (md²)}ω. Equating this with initial angular momentum of the block just before impact gives you ω
To find θ, find the change in potential energy of the rod and the stuck block, when the rod reaches the angle θ and momentarily come to rest. This then is ro be equated with initial rotational KE of the of the block using formula 0.5Iω², where I = {(M/3)+m}d²
Yeah i didnt. I think i know where i went wrong. Its MoI again, nasty little bugger, the MoI of a point is simply md^2, and i forgot to add this into my calculation.haruspex said:First, you don't mean w2, I hope. A moment of inertia is a mass multiplied by the square of a distance.
Secondly, you need to consider each body separately and add up their moments. What did you find for the moment of the block about O in post #26?