B Conservation of Energy: Ball on a U-Shaped Ramp

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulb203
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy as a ball rolls down a U-shaped ramp, illustrating the conversion between gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K). Without friction, the ball oscillates indefinitely between the heights of the ramp, with U at the tops and K at the bottoms. When friction is considered, some kinetic energy is lost to thermal and sound energy, preventing the ball from reaching the original height on the opposite side. The total energy remains constant, but it transforms into different forms, including internal energy due to friction. Overall, the explanation effectively captures the principles of energy conservation and transformation in this scenario.
paulb203
Messages
196
Reaction score
75
TL;DR Summary
Trying to grasp the basics
I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paulb203 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to grasp the basics

I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
Yeah, when you introduce friction you add some more “internal energy tanks” for the system and its surroundings i.e. the mass in the ball can change temperature, or the mass in the space around the ball can change temp, sound, light, and maybe some exotic things I don’t think/know about. These new tanks don’t share with potential and kinetic energy tanks without additional work, but they will share with each other. “Heat” ( the flow of thermal energy) will occur between the system and its surroundings.
 
  • Like
Likes paulb203 and Ibix
You got it.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top