High School Conservation of Energy: Ball on a U-Shaped Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulb203
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy as a ball rolls down a U-shaped ramp, illustrating the conversion between gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K). Without friction, the ball oscillates indefinitely between the heights of the ramp, with U at the tops and K at the bottoms. When friction is considered, some kinetic energy is lost to thermal and sound energy, preventing the ball from reaching the original height on the opposite side. The total energy remains constant, but it transforms into different forms, including internal energy due to friction. Overall, the explanation effectively captures the principles of energy conservation and transformation in this scenario.
paulb203
Messages
196
Reaction score
76
TL;DR
Trying to grasp the basics
I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paulb203 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to grasp the basics

I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
Yeah, when you introduce friction you add some more “internal energy tanks” for the system and its surroundings i.e. the mass in the ball can change temperature, or the mass in the space around the ball can change temp, sound, light, and maybe some exotic things I don’t think/know about. These new tanks don’t share with potential and kinetic energy tanks without additional work, but they will share with each other. “Heat” ( the flow of thermal energy) will occur between the system and its surroundings.
 
  • Like
Likes paulb203 and Ibix
You got it.
 
I built a device designed to brake angular velocity which seems to work based on below, i used a flexible shaft that could bow up and down so i could visually see what was happening for the prototypes. If you spin two wheels in opposite directions each with a magnitude of angular momentum L on a rigid shaft (equal magnitude opposite directions), then rotate the shaft at 90 degrees to the momentum vectors at constant angular velocity omega, then the resulting torques oppose each other...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K